Blog 6

Classroom Portrait

Outside:

The Rockbridge County High School is primarily composed of students from both the Harrington Waddell Elementary School and the Maury River Middle School due to how the Rockbridge County High School serves both Lexington and Rockbridge County areas. The school, according to the VDOE’s school quality profile, exhibits a satisfactory performance in all areas of assessment except when it comes to students with learning disabilities who are struggling with math. Moreover, the graduation rate rests at 91.5%, which is not far off from the state’s overall graduation rate of 92%. The school quality profile does, however, also reveal one of the biggest challenges that the school’s students face – economic issues. In the Rockbridge Community Profile, prepared by Jennifer Borman and Daniela Leon it states that “According to the 2013 U.S. Census, median household incomes in the Rockbridge area were significantly lower than the rest of Virginia… and the United States.” They assert that “the area is not immune from poverty” and that “poverty in Rockbridge is compounded by isolation and relative invisibility.” The Rockbridge County High School, however, as evidenced through me and my partner’s personal experience and through the statistics reviewed from the VDOE, does an excellent job at providing adequate assistance to students so as to create a conducive learning environment for everyone 

Inside: 

Mr. Simms’s and Ms. Trombetta’s classroom most certainly exhibited the same uplifting energy that permeated throughout most of the school. Upon arrival to their classroom, the students were chatting excitedly with one another, Mr. Simms, and Ms. Trombetta. This particular class certainly maintained a positive classroom culture. Moreover, the classroom definitely reflected PBL and EL principles. This was evident to me as soon as I saw the students work on the walls and, moreover, when Mr. Simms remarked to me that he allowed and encouraged his students to assist him with curating the course’s content. This amplification of student choice and voice and Mr. Simms’s practice of identifying and discussing with his students “real-world issues and problems students want to address” certainly reflect the principles of PBL and EL education. Aside from the students holding discussions with Mr. Simms, Ms. Trombetta also heavily encouraged the students to participate in class discussion and collaboration. When I inquired about how she thought it would be best to conduct a class discussion, the first thing she wrote to me was that “it’s important to let students voice their opinions while also respecting their classmates.”  Sometimes you could feel the energy of the classroom shift throughout the class. There was one moment where they did an activity on the board and everyone was excited for it, but once they sat back down it slightly turned into a lecture that the students didn’t necessarily feed into. All in all, the class could reap the benefits of PBL further down the line.

Final Reflection Tyain Smith

 This course was an interesting one to say the least. It was filled with headache, long nights, and a lot of emails but it was worth it. It gave me the opportunity to analyze and reflect on my education system growing up and what i realized is that the State of Virginia has and is continuing to fail its students and teachers by requiring the same broad, general, and shallow information to be taught throughout the years. I also discovered that Expeditionary Learning is an interesting tool to use to connect with students. For it to work fully, it must be introduced at a younger age to avoid resentment. For instance, in my observation of Mr. Simms 10th grade class at Rock Bridge High School, the students did not always partake in the open discussions. Leaving the teacher to lead the class in the discussion and slowly turning the open discussion into a lecture. Another way to reach the students rather than starting the Expeditionary Learning process earlier, is to step outside the comfort box as an educator and try to form a deep connection to each student. For example, I was watching “Freedom Writers” and Mrs. Gruwell, or Mrs. G, began to take an initiative to connect with her students on a deeper level than the general teacher would. She gave them notebooks and told them to write whatever they are feeling in them and if they wanted her to read it to leave it in the room storage closet for her to read. This seems so minuscule and small, but it led to the students responding and respecting her as a teacher because she went out of her way to connect with each student. Going off of that, some EL principles I will continue to spread and embody are “Diversity and Inclusion” and “Empathy and Caring” not because I want to see the world become a better place, but because these are the basic principles to live by. I am not just focusing on color diversity either, but diversity in the mind as well. If we could focus more on these two core principles our education system could change.

Thank you.

Inspiration for all levels

Book review of Teaching literacy in the digital age: Inspiration for all levels and literacies by Joy Myers and Melissa Adams-Budde provide a detailed and well thought out review of how Mark Gura formulated this book. They state that

Each chapter in the book highlights specific ideas rather than providing lesson plans in order to be applicable to a larger audience, and each is authored by a current classroom teacher or support staff who works directly with teachers (769).

 

Teaching literacy in the digital age: Inspiration for all levels and literacies is divided into five sections: (1) ‘‘Reinforcing reading and writing with video and audio’’; (2) ‘‘Analyzing and discussing literature’’; (3) ‘‘Story writing’’; (4) ‘‘Persuasive and argumentative writing’’; and (5) ‘‘And even more inspiration’’. Each section helps organize and embrace the new style of teaching. For instance, in section 1, Myers and Budde express that each chapter highlights how teachers can use video and audio in their teachings to drive home the basic reading and writing information (770).  One point I found interesting was Myers and Budde’s section 3 review. They state

Section 3 focus on activities related to story writing in middle and high school classrooms. These include graphic novel writing projects, interactive fiction and the relationship between comics and performance. According to the authors, there are several benefits of using a graphic novel writing format, including that stories can be told in non-traditional ways and that it is a motivating genre for students (770-771).

 

This is important because it gives students the ability to create and mold their thoughts into creations that could become masterpieces and inspire people coming in behind them.

I believe the biggest takeaway is not what the students produce, but the process of producing their masterpieces and how it effects the generation behind them. Our education system is missing that the process is more important than the product. Putting a grade on how a student thinks, responds, or creates is in itself a disservice to their growth and their education as a whole. Focusing on the product opens the gate for shortcuts, cheating, and short-term learning. The information I took from this reading is that we as a country are failing all around and if we really want to make a change, we should focus on the process rather than the product.

 

Work Cited

  1. Myers, Joy, and Melissa Adams-Budde. “Teaching Literacy in the Digital Age: Inspiration for All Levels and Literacies.” International Review of Education / Internationale Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft, vol. 63, no. 5, Oct. 2017, pp. 769–772. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1007/s11159-017-9649-y.

Second Visit in the bag

Blog 4

Our role in the class was not prepared well enough to make an impact. During class on Tuesday, Izzy and I came up with the plan to present our mini curriculum to the class that included mythologies, research, art projects, etc. We sent it to our teacher and were informed that they were past that portion of the class and will not be returning to that section. That unfortunately means that we must come up with a brand-new plan to fit the lesson plans present now within the class. So, when we went to the class on Thursday, we talked to our teacher and presented our idea to focus on the American mythology of our own justice system. She did not provide too much comment because we did not have a complete idea in place do to our adjustments. After this conversation she suggested we lead the second part of the discussion for today’s talk which required us to ask about stereotypes surrounding lawyers. When the discussion took place, we tried to incorporate the group think aspect of PBL and EL by allowing open discussion. That did not go as expected due to limited participation. My conclusion was, to be effective with these students, we have to first build a strong relationship by constant appearances, and one on one discussions with each child to find out how they best learn.

The best idea for a learning idea is somewhat irrelevant without first putting in the work to understand the children. In my opinion, no matter how effective our teaching methods are, no matter how creative they are, if the teachers can not take the time out to educate themselves on their students, no matter if they have 25-200, if the curriculum does not change to fit the teachers need to understand their students before even the first lesson is taught, then their will never be something creative enough to fulfill each student’s needs. Teaching can not be a “one size fits all” endeavor. It must match every student in their own way. Their can not be a S.O.L because not every student learns the same. Yes, EL and PBL have great ideas, but in order for these great ideas to come true there has to be a plan developed for each child to build a foundation that the teachers can adjust their lesson plans around. Without that, these teachers are at a disadvantage and the students are hindered even more because they cannot receive the basic knowledge needed to survive the world ahead. A world where they will not have the opportunity to rewrite, reword, or redo something before a serious punishment is handed down. My idea is this, get rid of the requirement to meet a S.O.L, have the college students studying to be teachers also become psychologist as well, and push for the student’s well-being instead of meeting a quota. These kids are not just numbers, but the future of this country.

Back in High School. Exciting!

 

Back in a High School so exciting… My visit to Mr. Simms’s 9th grade English class was everything you could expect from a high school class. Kids sleeping before class, on their phones, others are reading, but once the bell rung and class began, the students locked in for the most part. While we were observing the classroom, I noticed a few examples of the EL Education Design Principles like principle six “Collaboration and Competition”. There was not much of this principle throughout the class period due to the introduction to their new book. The examples that were present were one, the kids had an open discussion about the book and their perspectives of the characters presented. The other example of this principle was their group project they did in class. The project consisted of the children getting into groups and collaborating on how to draw the important scenes they have read so far. This is exactly what principle six means when it talks about the value of friendship and group action. The second principle that was present was principle two “Having Wonderful Ideas”. Throughout the open discussion on the book “Monster”, the teacher asked a few questions that sparked the creation of a few important ideas during class. One of the questions was “What is a Monster?” and one of the students answered saying “someone or something that causes fear and or fearful thoughts in other person”. This was an interesting answer that I wanted to hear more about but the teacher went onto another student. While observing, I was also tasked with scanning the room for important visuals that promote learning. While there I saw a few paintings on the walls, the daily objective was written on the side of the board, books on the book self in the back, and a new and improved board made to look like a jail cell was hanging in the back of the room. Personally, from what I have viewed so far, I believe that this potential PBL workspace could go either way due to the participation of some students but not all. The teacher’s awareness and effectiveness to find what works and does not work with each student. I believe that if these two minimal requirements were met on a consistent basis, the atmosphere of the classroom would increase from good to outstanding.

Expectations vs My reality

 

Expectations for first visit

What I expect to see in the classroom is a classroom filled with quotes, pictures, books, and paintings on the wall. I expect this because in our Project Based Learning book Boss discusses how teachers shape culture and states “Teachers shape culture in both obvious and less noticeable ways. For example, culture is reflected by the daily success starters and other routines, belief in a growth mindset, and even the physical arrangement of the room with the students seated in tables of four to foster collaboration” (Boss 15). Walking into the classroom I expect to see the teacher either in the front or in the back of the class but have enough room to walk around and connect with each student. Also, if our teacher is trying to incorporate Project Based Learning, I expect to see tables placed together to promote collaboration. Boss believes that it is important to promote a positive culture in order to further the ‘hidden curriculum” which is “where the culture is shaped by everything that students see, hear, feel, and interact with at school” (Boss 13). This is a great idea that personally my school never did. At both of my high schools, our classrooms were bland. There was no color within any of my classes. We sat in rows and did not do group work often. Also, we never had open dialogue when discussing a novel, we were reading. Everything was based off your S.O.L scores and did not promote actual educational growth like Boss describes in Chapter one of Project Based Learning. In fact, I would say our learning style at my high school hindered my growth as a student. My hope is that this class will be nothing like my high school and promote group thought, group work, open dialogue, and collaboration.

Dewey’s Unique Take on Education

One key note that I would like to address in the Dewey reading is his notion on the educational process having two sides. He states “this educational process has two sides-one psychological and one sociological-and that neither can be subordinated to the other, nor neglected, without evil results following” (Dewey 93). This is an interesting way to view education because when I look at education today, I think of factory style teaching, standardized test, and structure with no ability to wonder off and create something new and different. I would not have pictured the importance of understanding the psychological and sociological aspects to a certain extent that Dewey deems necessary. Dewey continues with “The psychological is the basis. The child’s own instincts and powers furnish the material and give the starting point for all education” (Dewey 93). I believe using this ideology as a starting point would be a great conversation starter. Instead of focusing on the masses of students, generalizing the teaching styles, and generalizing the topics, I believe we should look at how we can affect students individually by getting rid of the simplistic factoring teaching and introducing a new way of educating each other. One idea would be to introduce a student teaching time. Where a student, no matter how right or wrong they are, would get in front of the class and teach their fellow class mates the topic of the day. It could be for 5-10 minutes at the beginning of class and the teacher would come in after and teach the topic at hand the “correct way”. I believe a program like this would go hand and hand with Dewey’s thoughts on the educational process. It would encourage kids to be themselves, teach how they would like to teach, build confidence, and it would allow the teachers to analyze their students to figure out new ways to connect with an individual student.