To share a research conversation with our partner classroom, I wanted to use something I experienced inside Mr. Simms class that I never saw when I was going through K-12–the use of laptops regularly inside of the class. The students were able to use their laptops freely inside of the classroom environment to aid in their learning and their ability to provide information to the discussion between the class members and Mr. Simms. This allowed more people to be able to talk about a subject that, in my classes, kept people from speaking for fear of getting the wrong answer or being called out for knowing something that the others did not.
In her article Payne notes that, “The average score, looking at students’ multiple-choice and short-answer scores, was roughly 71.7 percent, with a standard deviation of 9.2 percentage points. Students in classrooms without Internet-connected devices earned the highest average score of 72.9 percent. Students in classrooms where laptop and tablet usage was not restricted earned the lowest scores, on average, at 70.5 percent, a difference of 2.4 percentage points. Students in classrooms where only tablets were allowed under strict conditions did slightly better, with an average score of 71.4 percent, but they still had lower scores than students in the technology-free group” (Carter). This shows how the laptops in the classroom do not decrease the average score by a margin large enough to deem them as being bad to the learning environment. This is also shown in the same article with the statement, ” Instructor controls are important, as we want to eliminate any differences from instructors who are better or worse at delivering the material. Class-hour controls account for whether students perform differently at different hours of the day, such as before or after lunch. Semester controls ensure that differences are not driven by slight variations in the course between the two semesters” (Carter). Even though the laptops have a lower score than no technology, this is accounted for with the way that the teacher controls the class, which is everything to the student for their learning capability.
CARTER, SUSAN PAYNE, et al. “Should Professors Ban Laptops? How Classroom Computer Use Affects Student Learning.” Education Next, vol. 17, no. 4, Fall 2017, pp. 68–74. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=125076083&site=ehost-live&scope=site.
Mason,
You’ve chosen a relevant article that can help you think about tools for project-based learning. I learned something from this data, and I liked that you created a clear purpose at the beginning of your review.
For your revisions due Thursday, April 9, I would recommend the following to strengthen the good ideas brewing in your review:
Consider restructuring your opening sentence into a direct address, imagining Mr Simms as your reader, such as: “Growing up as a K-12 student, I never had the advantage of x . . . then add your experience, and so consequently I .. .
Then I might segue to article focus/ title, such as “Since coming to participate in your class at RCHS, I’ve been curious about your use of laptops and their ability to promote PBL learning habits. . . . I recently reviewed an article by Susan Payne, “Title” that argues (summary) the use of laptops as tools that promote . . .
After introducing articles claims/ evidence, you can evaluate the article based on your experience of his classroom–
Ron and I experienced X in your classroom and it seemed to (reconnect with article) . . .
Finally, engage with Mr Simms–what do these learning scores help you discuss with Mr. Simms partnership, about his future decisions with curricular choices?
Happy to discuss ideas in virtual office hours (on discussion board or by zoom) Monday or Tuesday in lieu of class-just let me know.
MAJ Hodde
Mason, I liked the article on laptops, I chose a similar topic about technology in the classroom. I think you should delve more on possible solutions to how a teacher can maintain control of laptop usage in the classroom.
Statistics make things seem more official good job.