This argument about the wall bordering the southern United States and Mexico is extremely one-sided because he addresses no other side of the argument but his own. He uses a lot of charged visuals and statements to develop his argument, such as the wall plowing through someone’s house, thereby preventing the homeowner from using her restroom. He does this to portray the invasiveness that the wall will have on the public. He uses many hypothetical situations to display the mootness of building a very expensive wall. He also used the statistic that 20-40% of illegal immigrants come from expired visas, rather than simply crossing the border, so this expenditure wouldn’t be getting rid of illegal immigrants entirely.