I am fairly nervous about the use of computer software to track data. This is not a strong suit of mine. I hope that I am able to improve on the reading and tracking of data through this class, as I know that this is a major part of International Studies and Political Science; the tracking and analyzation of data.

Garrett Smith

Colonel Miller

ERH 321WX 02

9 September 2018

1 Henry IV- English Views of Civic Order and Rebellion

Part 1

Throughout the story of King Henry IV there exists a duality of the political and home front. There existed in both court and tavern rebellious and riotous behavior that threatened to turn the political and social order upside down. Hotspur went so far as to call it “topsy-turvy down.” On one hand it comes from the Earls and leaders of the Percy family and their alliances. There does exist a certain other rebellious nature on the home front from the King’s own son who wants to shirk his own regal responsibilities and almost desires to ‘stick it to’ his father. By the time of the late medieval period, there was a firmly entrenched notion of natural law, or the concept that the King was the vice regent of God. At the same time there was a fine balance between political reform concerning the balance of power between the monarchy and parliament, and the power retained by the regent. A fine line had to be walked in order to avoid a usurpation of power. The play itself delves into the questions of the righteous use of power, the relationship between kings and their subjects, and the rights of subjects to rebel.

Although there had been a central monarchy in Great Britain for generations and typically the throne was passed down via direct descendants, there existed a feudal, familial system. This system was mostly found in the powerful northern families who were able to dole maintain a strong level of autonomy by doling out privileges to those that promised loyalty to them. In this system these families found themselves rulers of their own pseudo fiefdoms, able to raise and attempt to mount rebellions occasionally. Through this there was a problem with the competing loyalties. Loyalty to the lineage, and loyalty to the nation state and empire. Although religious dissidence did not play as large a part in Henry IV’s, previous and subsequent revolts scared the monarchy enough to prompt the writing of a specific homily to be read in church that would denounce rebellion and treason to the crown. They even went far enough as to cover the bases of good and bad leaders. Good leaders were blessings bestowed by God, conversely a bad leader was a pox put on subjects for their sins. The homily made it a sin to rebel even when the king is poor, since ‘subjects cannot judge their king.’ This single homily remained constant for several generations, the ultimate piece of propaganda that was used to align the monarchy, God, and the country and to tamp out rebellion.

The homily went so far as to call attention to the fact that murderers and thieves were comparatively not as bad as the rebel, since the rebel spoiled the lives of a great many whereas the thief and murderer only spoiled the lives of a few. It also stated that “all good laws are by rebels violated and broken, and all sins possible to be committed against God or man, be contained in rebellion.” It stands then that anyone who participated in a rebellion was to be ostracized by his kin, countrymen, and any he kept company with. This effectively super stigmatized rebellion.

The late medieval British monarchies so feared rebellion that they made it the ultimate sin through their hijacking of the power of the church and the word of God. All other sins fell by the wayside or were encompassed by the sin of rebellion. Rebellion could be the cause of famine and plague, murder and thievery. If God disliked war, he hated civil war, and absolutely detested rebellion. Great Britain was ruled through the monarchy which acted as the right hand of God on earth. To rebel was to weaken the kingdom and accordingly to weaken God’s earthly grasp and bow down and invite Lucifer himself to take hold. Rebels who failed to repent would have an express trip to hell upon their inevitable defeat and execution.

Part 2  

In the play, Thomas Percy is seen as a manipulative and conniving old man. The uncle of Hotspur, he is guessed to be a strong hand in the rebellion, if not the ringleader himself. He is the Earl of Worcester and one of the heads of the powerful Percy family who helped bring the King to power. He is seen repeatedly manipulating the youthful arrogance of Hotspur and is even called out by the King’s own advisors as being the likely cause of Hotspur refusing to send his prisoners of war in the manner of tidings to the king.

Thomas Percy is a close approximation of the idea that rebellion is an all-encompassing, horrendous sin. Towards the end of the play, Thomas Percy is given information that the king would be willing to negotiate favorable terms of surrender that included pardons if the rebels only laid down their weapons, or barring that, Hotspur and Harry could face off in single combat and spare a whole battle. In his own arrogance and selfishness, Thomas decides not to tell Hotspur about this based on his belief that he would never truly be pardoned. His decision to carry out this battle on his own self-interested terms, resulted in upwards of 5,000 casualties and the deaths of several notable rebels that could have survived given the chance.

In this case, rebellion encompassed the sins of lying, in that fact that Percy lied to Hotspur about the nature of his diplomatic talks, greed in that he acted selfishly and sacrificed many, many lives, to include some of his own family. He was also a murderer and is directly responsible for the death of every man on that battlefield, whether peasant or noble.

Worcester:

“O, no, my nephew must not know, Sir Richard, the liberal and kind offer of the King.” (V, II, 1-2)

Vernon:

“’Twere best he did.” (V, II, 3)

Worcester then goes on to explain how the king would always truly be suspicious of him and that while Hotspur could be forgiven and pardoned based on his youthful ignorance, he as an older man should know better. He believes that because of this the king will one day find a reason to trump up charges against him and have him executed. Worcester is cunning and wily enough to convince Vernon to side with him on this and lie to Hotspur, at least until a later time. He even takes the time to embellish the tale of how he presented their case to the king and begged for another solution to war.

Hotspur:

“Did you beg any? God forbid!” (V, II, 37)

Worcester:

“I told him gently of our grievances, of his oath breaking, which he mended thus, by now forswearing that he is forsworn. He calls us rebels, traitors and will scourge us with haughty arms this hateful name in us.” (V, II, 38-42)

Shakespeare is rather subtle about it but based on the homily that stated that rebellion encompassed all other sins, Worcester was the great deceiver.

Shakespeare, William. The First Part of King Henry the Fourth; Texts and Contexts . Edited by Barbara Hodgdon.

Help Received:

online citation creator MLA citation.

Works in work cited.

Used a modern English version of the play found online in order to ensure I understood concepts when writing about them. Compared to in text from the book.

Used Wikipedia to check casualty figures from the Battle of Shrewsbury.

China has an outdated view and policy on the Korean Peninsula, they have consistently been an ally of the North and shunted and sanctioned the South. Even though at this point China realizes the threat that the North presents, and has acknowledged the very real nuclear threat that they present. They have failed to adapt their policy, going so far as to allow strengthening military and economic alliances including the US to develop all around them, weakening their own position. They have upheld treaties and agreements with the North even as the North has continued in their belligerence. China is fast approaching a critical “us or them” point in which they are going to need to choose one way or another, the fate of the peninsula and also, the fate of China.

Chinese human rights lawyer Li Heping has been sentenced to a three year suspended jail term in a closed door trial. Famous for defending other prominent lawyers in China involved in activities that protested government human rights violations. reportedly he was detained on charges of  smear and attack campaigns against the state. This is merely the latest in a serious of moves made by Xi Jinping’s party in order to crack down on political dissent of any form. Though he and many others have seemingly disappeared, their wives and the political rights organization “Amnesty,” have both campaigned for his release, questioning his detainment and questioning the due process. This is in line with the regime’s crackdown, which leads us to ask how long they will continue this backward trend.

Even though there are rising tensions between the US and China, there is a growing market for American vehicles in China, specifically the Ford brand will be expanding out there. Recently there has been a push for American made products, they are seen as more reliable, and a sign of wealth in the Chinese Society. However, prices will be different with some Trucks selling for as little as $7k and some as much as $81k. In addition to Ford, GM will also be expanding business, going to show that even though political tensions are high, money talks.

Westinghouse is a nuclear energy company who is filing for bankruptcy protection, it is currently based in Japan and the Trump administration is very concerned that China may try and buy it. The problem with that is that there are many important nuclear energy secrets in these power plants that China will then have access to without having to discover them themselves or through theft. This is concerning because China is rapidly growing and seeking to catch up to the US on nuclear energy output. Japan also is concerned about China catching up and surpassing their nuclear technology.

In a major move towards ensuring that they have a stable food supply able to support their growing population, Chinese food giant ChemChina has bought out Swiss owned Syngenta, the world’s largest source of seeds and genetically modified foods. For the price of $43 billion dollars China now controls the largest amount of seeds and technology on modifying foods. It will be interesting to see where they go from here, as of now the state still forbids human consumption of genetically modified foods and there is little public knowledge of its research. This purchase could drastically change the rest of the worlds ability to access much of this technology.

In a surprising change of stance, Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte has ordered the country’s navy down to the Spratly islands in the SCS. This area has historically been disputed territory between Asian countries. While the navy will not be challenging Chinese territory, they will be reinforcing and building new infrastructure in Philippine territory. This likely is a response to the appeasement policy that Duterte has had recently and the backlash he has faced. It will be interesting to see how this plays out as tensions rise between the rising power that is China and the small island nation pushing back.

Today Chinese President Xi Jinping is meeting for the first time with President Trump, he has been invited down to Trump’s Florida home- Mar-a-lago. This marks a huge point in the Trump administration as the US relationship with China has been a cornerstone of the new administration’s foreign policy. Tensions will most likely be high and many wonder how long the cordiality will last. Trump’s main point will likely be North Korea, China’s relationship with them and how best to counter them.

Just days ago authorities received tips that much of the produce that Brazil had been exporting to them was rotten and expired. In response a massive investigation was launched and several meat packing plants have been closed, in addition to that, many of the inspectors have been suspended and are being investigated on charges of corruption. This was a crippling blow to Brazil as China and Hong Kong are the two single biggest importers of their produce. After hearing of this, the EU and several other countries also placed restrictions on the imports, in total this accounts for 1/3 of Brazils exports and has placed them in a state of emergency as this is the staple of their economy.