Article 2
Will Ross
Reflective Tag
The global gender gap, while on the decline, is certainly prevalent and continues to be a problem in certain global regions. Even countries such as the U.S. and Japan, long-considered developed, place poorly within gender gap rankings due to the continual existence of underrepresentation and wage inequality. Africa and the Middle East, due to cultural factors such as religion and social hierarchy continue to rank at the bottom in both gender gap and maternal health studies. Only through continual education for both men and women alongside much-needed aid in poverty-stricken areas can this be overcome.
Article 2
The global gender gap is used to refer to the disparity between male and female equality within a country. Countries are ranked on a scale between ‘0’0 and ‘1’, with ‘1’ meaning that 100% of the inequality between men and women has been closed.
The kinds of criteria/measurements used to determine the ‘gender gap’ come in four separate categories. First, economic participation and opportunity, based on access to upper division employment opportunities, workplace participation levels, and salaries differences. Second, Educational attainment, based primarily on one’s access to both basic and upper levels of education. Third, political involvement, based on the proportion of women in decision-making institutions. Lastly, health and survival, based on the proportion of sex in newborn populations and overall life expectancy of each gender.
The U.S. ranks 20th in terms of gender gap, due in large part to its abysmal rank of 54th in terms of female political participation and its strikingly unequal wages where women still earn 77% of every dollar a male worker does. In comparison, Top Ten countries tend to have higher overall levels across the board, specifically in regards to upper echelon positions. In Sweden, ranked 4th globally, 57% of its political ministers are women, compared to just 32% in the United States. The countries at the tail end of the list also share common attributes. Inequalities within the workplace and political realm remain rampant and the term justice is used consistently to describe the different treatment women received at the hands of the legal system where an accusation of rape can lead to the punishment of the woman as much as the party responsible. Even more surprising is the low rank of countries seen to be fully developed. Japan sits at 104th in terms of global gender gap equality, largely thanks to not only an absence of women in the workplace but also in the government, where only 8% of lawmakers are female.
Reproductive responsibilities can also contribute to the gender gap. Nonexistent maternity leave and lax rules and regulations governing workplace rights can lead to women getting fired from their work on account of pregnancies. Societal norms can further magnify these effects with women receiving constant pressure to produce children simply because that is how their role is perceived by their community.
The countries at the top and those at the bottom of the Maternal Health (Save the Children) report have almost no common factors, perhaps the only one being that some of those at the top colonized those at the bottom. Within each group there are commonalities, the top 10 (except Australia) are all European while the bottom 10 are all African.
Saudi Arabia is an excellent example of how gender roles affect women’s status and health. Health tends to be reflective of social status which, for women in Saudi Arabia, is bad news. Lower rates of health care access, prevalent domestic abuse, low levels of education, poverty (usually the result of the death of the ‘man of the house’), and lack of workplace opportunity means that the higher longevity seen in women compared to men is fast declining.