The Shadow of the Holy Book
Will Ross
HR: None
The Shadow of the Holy Book is a window into the corrupt world of doing business in Turkmenistan, a poor country ruled by (until 2006) iron-fisted Saparmurat Niyazov. Niyazov cemented his power further by publishing the “Ruhnama”, a ‘holy’ book that meshed aspects of Islam, Niyazov’s life, and a warped concept of Turkmen history in order to encourage a cult following behind Niyazov, commonly referred to as Turkmenbashi, father of the Turkmen.
In order to win lucrative contracts, multinational corporations would curry favor by translating and publishing the “Ruhnama” in their own languages and some (John Deere) went so far as to have “Ruhnama” t-shirts, coffee mugs, and a website dedicated to its sale. The filmmakers travel around the world, demanding answers and atonement from these companies that made millions off a country whose people are in near-constant poverty.
Yet despite the wealth of intrigue and mysticism, the film’s message against corporate greed and cult iconicism is overshadowed by the filmmakers’ nagging questions and Michael Moore-esque dialogue, more annoying than productive. However, through all of this, the theme of human rights before profits is still clear. Not one representative of any of these corporations chose to talk to the filmmakers, save for one Finnish CEO who alone provided the moral light in the darkness that is commerce in Turkmenistan.
The death of Niyazov midway through filming throws the perfect wrench into the film, which is able to capture the transition to Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedow. While initially hopeful, it becomes apparent that the death of Niyazov will not bring lasting change to the country, where one figurehead is simply replaced by another. Indeed, the release of Berdimuhamedow’s own book, while not explicitly religious in nature, is nothing more than his very own “Ruhnama”, as children are taught to memorize and intern his book as they were the “Ruhnama”.
Overall the film was eye-opening, not in terms of the breadth of corruption in Turkmenistan or the cult following its leaders have possessed, but in how incredibly self-centered and irritating budding filmmakers can be when things don’t go their way. No doubt a product of Michael Moore’s incessant nagging, the film ends up obscuring its true goal by focusing on how hard it is to make a documentary as opposed to contacting the companies it seeks to interview any other way besides their press office.