Lecture 4/11

Activity 1

It is a statement and could be better if the writer were to say what the problem with their thesis statements are and/or how they intend/did fix them. The thesis statement ironically almost did not exist, something the author stated. I feel it gives me no indication as to what the paper will be, a plain statement of fact or an argument.

Activity 2

I would give the paper a 3.

  • The thesis was almost non-existent.
  • The at least mentioned some outside facts, but went into almost no detail.
  • Because of the poor thesis, the paper seemed jumbled together and I had trouble following along.
  • The last paragraph starts with “In conclusion”, it sounded weird.
  • Grammar made the paper hard to read.

Activity 3

I agree with the ranking of “3”

  • The first paragraph contained little of a thesis, instead it already began arguing, I could not tell where the paper was going.
  • Grammar, ex:

“However, to be honest I still think I have this problem today, but I am going to improve it.”

Instead:

“However, to be honest, I believe this problem persists. That is why I am working to correct said deficiency.”

That could work better.

  • The last paragraph did not restate the thesis.

Activity 4

It did not answer the prompt, nor was there much detail given as to how the writer improved; the writer only said that they did.

Answer 5

I learned that giving examples (and explaining their relevance) is my friend, if I say something, I should give examples, and some things do not need explained (my audience does not need simple things like a thesis explained, that could cause them to lose interest in my paper).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *