1.) Daniel Mitchell, a senior economist.
2.) Anyone who is researching the feasibility of flat taxes.
3.) It is an online article on the Heritage Foundation website.
4.) The piece is conservative leaning, and is not peer reviewed.
5.) 75% of their revenues are from individuals, while 15% are organizations and companies.
6.) He is identifying the need for a flat tax.
7.) He reminds people that he is an economist and a senior fellow at one of the most influential think tanks in the world.
8.) He does not like the government.
9.) Not much is censored at all.
10.) He is one of the top economists in the country, so therefore he knows what he is talking about.
11.) He lists of a lot of statistics about the waste of the IRS, He uses 65 different sources from many different sources.
12.) The waste of the government is outrageous, and a smaller government would solve these problems.
13.) It has strengthened my stance, because it supports all of what I have already said.
14.) It is evidence that the current system does not work.
15.) They will agree with it.
16.) No, it is not an opposing view.
17.) No.
18.) Yes.
19.) The whole article would support my argument.
20.) Yes.
21.) Yes.