- What makes the first summary unfair? How can you tell? – The first summary is unfair because of the language the author uses to describe her and her views. He begins his summary with calling the article a “biased” article. In the first few words of the summary he has already taken an unfair stance, he does not even try to give Turner’s opinion a chance. Also, he does not give a single unbiased opinion about Lisa Turner, every sentence in the summary is derogatory.
- What strategies does the writer use to make the opposing view seem weak and flawed? In the fair summary how is the view made strong and clear?- The author uses a lot of harsh diction to make Turner’s view weak and flawed. He says, “lacking scientific understanding” and “misinformed attacks” to make her argument seems like it has to truth whatsoever. In the fair summary, his use of diction changes the way a reader might feel about Turners argument. He says, “health food advocate” to describe Turner. By giving Turner a neutral title that shows her line of work, he is being fair to her argument. He shows that she is a reliable source which makes her argument seem strong and clear.
- In the unfair summary, how does the writer attack turners motives and credentials? How does the writer treat turner differently in the fair summary?- In the unfair summary, the writer attacks turners motives and credentials. He calls her a natural food huckster, basically calling what she does as a profession, a fake and unneeded job. He also attacks her motives by exaggerating her claims to show that genetically modified food is bad. In the fair summary, the writer simply gives the details and facts about Turners argument on genetically modified food. The writer does not show his stance or add an details on how he feels about the argument.
- Do you agree with our view that arguments are more persuasive if the writer summarizes opposing views fairly rather than unfairly? Yes, arguments are more persuasive when the writer is fair. This is because if you give too much of your own opinion and use harsh language the reader will know that the writing is completely bias. Also, the argument will be confusing, the reader will not be able to see the strengths or weaknesses of the argument.
My New Blog
Just another Virginia Military Institute ePortfolio site
