Mens time of the month

I think that if men could menstruate it would be a openly discussed topic. Take a step into barracks and you’ll find that men aren’t very concerned with hiding their bodily movements, farts, burps, dip spit or really any other gross thing they do. The bathrooms in particular are a NSFW story to themselves. Men would openly make fun of each other’s periods and somehow it would come to be an insult just like being a dick is. We’d definitely see an increase in spending into how menstruation works and I think that charting your period would be a really normal thing.

Research into menstrual suppression would be driven by the professional sports leagues. The NFL only has 16 regular season games and they do everything they can to make sure that all of their players are in the best possible condition to perform on those days. Pitchers in baseball take the mound once every five games and are notorious for missing starts due to minor illnesses or even bruised fingers. To maximize performance, I think that professional sports leagues would heavily invest into menstrual suppression so that their athletes can feel in their prime physically and mentally. Even with that I’d be willing to bet that an athletes menstrual cycle would be taken into consideration during contract negotiations almost as a prior injury is today.

Teenage years would be especially difficult for young men if they had a large increase of testosterone every month. Already aggressive teenagers could be very difficult to deal with and I think that fights in middle and high schools would increase if young men didn’t learn to understand when they’re going to be PMSing. Having an app that would track your menstrual cycle would be very common and people would probably talk a lot more about their cycles if both men and women had a menstrual cycle. Since both men and women would be equal in that respect it would be a lot easier to talk about publicly.

Artifact 4, put the snippers away

Male and female circumcision is almost always a procedure that a child or newborn baby undergoes, without their consent. In both males and females, their parents are the ones deciding that they need to be circumcised. Whether it is for cultural, religious, or for medical purposes 200 million women worldwide have been circumcised and 1/3 of all men are circumcised. In all cases it is the parents making the decision for their child to be circumcised as a means to better their life. However, in western nations while male circumcision is seen as a beneficial medical practice female circumcision is seen as genital mutilation.

Male circumcision involves removing the foreskin of the penis in order to reduce the chances of developing an infection and as a means to reduce the transmission of STI’s. Female circumcisions vary in both amount of flesh removed and effects of the procedure. Type 1a circumcision is the removal of the clitoral hood to leave the clitoris more exposed. Types 1b, 2, and 3 vary in level of flesh removed but ultimately reduce a woman’s ability to experience pleasure from sex. Type 3 female circumcisions involve removal of the inner and outer labia, and then sewing together the affected area. Male circumcision can be looked at as comparable to a type 1a female circumcision where types 1b-3 would equate to removing all nerves from the penis to completely destroying the penis. Although female circumcision can easily be viewed as mutilation it is seen as a beneficial procedure in parts of Africa and southern Asia.

The practice of circumcision gives insight into how a culture values their women. In African and south Asian cultures where female circumcision is practiced women are seen as a means to an end. Sex for women is supposed to only be a means of producing children and they are not meant to derive pleasure from it, whereas the men are not mutilated and can experience pleasure from sex. Some in those cultures even view female circumcisions as a means of protecting their daughters so that they do not become promiscuous. In order to end female circumcision, it is going to take mass education of African and Asian cultures that continue the practice.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_genital_mutilation#WHO_Types_I.E2.80.93II

Male and Female breast cancer

Breast Cancer in men vs. women

Although extremely rare, breast cancer does develop in some men. Over 99% of breast cancer patients are female and only 1/1000 men will develop breast cancer in their lives. Breast cancer is the 2nd leading cause of death in women. Although it may seem strange that a male would develop a disease that on the surface would seem like only women could contract, a man’s breast cells and tissue can still develop cancer. In women, the disease usually comes from genetic mutations. These mutations can either be passed down from generation to generation, or occur as a random mutation in an individual. A family history of breast cancer greatly increases an individual’s risk. For men, the risk is especially high when they have a family history of breast cancer associated with the BRCA2 gene.

The symptoms and development of breast cancer in males and females is very similar. Most patients experience a lump underneath of their breast tissue. However, the survival rate for women is much higher than the survival rate for men. This is mostly attributed to the way men and women are screened for breast cancer. Women over the age of 45 are recommended to undergo a mammogram every year to check for malignant tissue and tumors. Men however, do not undergo screening for breast cancer. Often times by the time that a male patient learns that they have breast cancer it is too late.

Normally breast cancer originates in the ducts that carry milk to the nipple. It can also occur in the glands that produce breast milk. For this reason, it is both extremely rare, and odd for men to develop breast cancer. Breast cancer can also develop in tissue of the breast not associated with milk production and are considered to be sarcomas or lymphomas and are not usually considered to be true breast cancer. Breast cancer can spread from the breasts to other parts of the body through the lymphatic system. This contributes to its high mortality rate when detection is late. For most men and women who have late detection of breast cancer it is extremely difficult to be cured.

http://www.nationalbreastcancer.org/male-breast-cancer
https://www.cancer.org/cancer/breast-cancer/about/how-does-breast-cancer-form.html

Guyland Reflection

One of the points that hit me in Guyland was that calling something gay or calling someone a faggot is the go to insult for any locker room or middle school and high school boys. The speaker was absolutely right that it had nothing to do with being gay or anything to do with homosexuals, it was just the insult that young adult men favored to call each other. I think that Steve Carrel acting as Michael Scott does a really good job of explaining how young adults use the word faggots after he accidently called a closeted homosexual co-worker a “faggot.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOLbuFVG0fs

This strikes close to home for me because Junior year of high school one of my close friends came out of the closet. Up until that point my friends and I treated him like anyone else and would mess with him, call him gay or faggot just jokingly like adolescent males do to anyone other males their close with. But then when he came out, everyone in my friend group had to take a step back and say that it was pretty messed up to call him all of those insults now that we knew that he was a homosexual. However, if he had never come out we would have never considered anything we said to him to be wrong or to be offensive, or as Michael Scott would say, “in bad taste.”

Obviously being gay is much more accepted now than it was when my parents grew up, and even when I was born in the 90’s. However, the way that young men talk to each other hasn’t really changed. The speaker in Guyland talked about how when he was a kid calling something gay was still insulting. But it’s not the 90’s anymore and the stigma towards homosexuals is significantly less than it was and is almost disappearing entirely in my generation. However, we still talk the same way that young men have talked for years and there needs to be a change. It’s no longer acceptable (not that it was in the first place) to use a person’s sexual identity as an insult, or as a way to describe something that you think is dumb or unfair.

So, because of this change, my group of friends had to change the way we talked, but most adolescents don’t have an experience like this, and for us it was still too late to make a difference for our friend. It makes a lot of sense in retrospect that he seemed to be sad more often than most of my friends. It will be interesting to see in the future with generations that are more accepting of different sexual preferences if the language adolescents will change or remain the same.

Pornland:
-Porn is an industry
-Porn promotes sexual violence
-Porn is becoming more violent
-Porn affects the way that men view women

Guyland:
-Adults are developing slower
-Young adults are switching jobs horizontally instead of working at a career vertically
-Gender inequality is perpetuated a a male dominated society

Artifact 3: Navajo Equality

The Navajo are a tribe of American Indians that traditionally resided in pueblo dwellings in Southwest of the United States. These dwellings were traditionally governed by female patriarchs and consisted of several closely related matriarchal families. the Navajo depended on horticulture as their means of providing for themselves. While both men and women were involved in farming, women engaged in foraging and domestic tasks as well, only spending part of their time working in the fields while men traditionally spent all of their time working in the fields. Men were also responsible for creating raiding parties that would engage in raids and wars of local Navajo and American settlers.

The head of a Navajo dwelling is always a matriarch. Family ties are decided by the mother’s lineage. Men work for their mother’s family until they are married, in which case they go to live with their wife’s family and work for them. However, men in Navajo culture still have rights. They are allowed to own property, typically sheep, and their property will transfer from their family with them to their wife’s family in marriage. Both men and women can ask for a divorce and rates of spousal abuse are extremely rare in Navajo culture. Especially early in a marriage divorce was fairly common. Men would only bring over a token number of their livestock at first in a marriage and then slowly bring more over as the relationship became more stable. Men are allowed to take multiple wives, however will typically marry sisters as they must live with their wife’s family.

Unfortunately, gender roles have changed since the Mexican-American War. After slaughtering all but 8,000 of the Navajo in the Indian Wars U.S. officials refused to negotiate with matriarchs and instead insisted on communicating with male leaders. For this reason, men became responsible for interacting with the United States government and have since held more of a leadership role. In the great depression, many Navajo men and women had to go into wage labor in order to sustain their families. Gender differences occurred in the Navajo community because men were paid more for their labor than women were. The types of jobs that men and women took were also gender linked. Men worked in construction, building maintenance, railroad and highway repair, mining, and forestry while women were employed as service sector employees, school aides and as factory operatives. For the first time in Navajo history men and women’s work was wholly separated. Although men and women held different responsibilities before relying on wage labor they still held common ground while working the fields.

Despite these western based gender differences male dominance has not developed. Women’s autonomy is respected and their rights have in no way been undermined. Although women’s economic contributions have been weekend underlying social and religious ideologies have maintained balance between the genders.

Artifact 2: The forgotten gender

The Khawaja sara is the politically correct name for transgendered women in Pakistan. Although they are officially recognized as a third sex and enjoy better treatment than gay men in the country, who are often murdered or imprisoned, they still face daily discrimination and harassment.

During the era of the Mughals in the 1500’s and 1600’s Khawaja sara were army generals, harem managers, and royal court officials. However, when the highly conservative and Christian, British colonized Pakistan they took away the rights that transgendered individuals had. Under British rule the Khawaja sara where seen as indecent and their existence was outlawed by the Criminal Tribes Act (1871). This law placed the Khawaja sara under compulsory registration, strict monitoring, and deep rooted social stigma that has persisted till today. Fortunately for the Khawaja sara the Pakistani Supreme Court officially recognized the third gender in 2009. Transgendered individuals now have a separate identifier on their ID’s and are allowed to vote. Interestingly, and unfortunately transgendered men do not share these same rights in Pakistan, and although they should still technically be able to register as transgendered none have attempted this so far.

To this day Khawaja sara face discrimination. They are often harassed in public and made fun of because many in Pakistan believe that their only use is as sex workers or as beggers. They also face violence and there is little that they can do legally as the court system does little to protect them even though they have officially become recognized.

Artifact 1 Unfair Gender Expectations

Sex and gender vary in that sex is a combination of an individual’s bodily characteristics, where gender “describes the characteristics that a society or culture delineates as masculine or feminine.” Sex is something that an individual is given at birth, while gender is something that an individual identifies as normally by age 5. Gender however, is not something than an individual decides upon, instead is based upon ideals of what masculinity and femininity is in their culture and how they themselves fit into the social system.

In western culture masculinity has traditionally been associated with being a leader, being stronger, rough housing, and being able to solve problems. Femininity is traditionally associated with being pretty, being graceful, and supporting their masculine counterparts. Blue is supposed to be a boy color and pink is supposedly a girl color. Traditionally not fitting into these gender molds was considered wrong. However as younger generations are becoming more able to accept we now know that many individuals, all across the gender spectrum, do not fit into these molds.

These traditional gender roles tell young boys that they can grow up to be anything. Their supposed to grow up to be big and strong, where girls are brought up in a culture that conditions them to want to play inside and grow up to be a housewife. Most girl’s toys are centered around a house, while boy’s toys typically are based around adventure or violence. Ken and Barbie have a house together while GI Joe and the Power Rangers are out fighting monsters and the forces of evil. Even in movies marketed to children we see that the male gender tends to have a dominant presence over the feminine characters. In movies like Mulan and Pocahontas, movies based around female heroes, male characters make up more than 75% of the dialogue. This subjugation of the female gender in society teaches young girls that they are somehow less important than the male gender. Society needs to place a larger emphasis on promoting positive feminine values, and quit viewing confidence as a bitchy trait, while expecting it from masculinity.

Help Received:
I got a definition for gender that I could quote from: http://www.med.monash.edu.au/gendermed/sexandgender.html

Getting Started

Over the last semester I have been forced to go through a process of revision in my works of writing that I was previously unaccustomed to. The process involves multiple rewrites, peer editing, and self-revision. It takes significantly longer to finish writing anything but I have seen great improvement in the quality of my work. This new and lengthy revision process forces me to re-evaluate my thesis statement several times as I write. My body paragraphs often go through the most significant change through out my essay so my thesis must adapt to tie together all of the body paragraphs. Typically my thesis would be re-written for every draft. Unfortunately
My new process of drafting and revision has three stages, each one taking a week to allow myself time to distance myself from the essay to take on new perspectives and come up with new ideas. For my first draft I don’t bother with writing any introductory pieces or making a conclusion. I always write a short thesis instead just to keep my writing on topic but as I explained is in no way permanent. The way I think of it I’m simply rambling and writing whatever comes to mind for about 1000 words and then I call it quits. Once this first draft is finished I let my peers go through it and tear it up, which they do. All I want to see from them is what ideas they liked and what ideas they thought didn’t fit. The first essay I wrote this year was an explanation of how I go through the process of writing. It had been about four months since I had to write an academic paper and I had no idea what I was doing. In what I submitted as my first draft I had five different ideas all vying for attention. If I hadn’t had someone go through my essay and told me what worked and didn’t I probably couldn’t have gotten through the paper. Once I get through this step I make an outline using the good paragraphs and then just cut out the ones that don’t fit.
After I’ve made an outline from my strong paragraphs I go back in to re-write my main ideas and to add more examples, detail, and also to make sure that everything conforms to a central Idea. Typically this is the last step before I go in and fix all of my grammatical and sentence flow errors. I wasn’t a fan of writing this way at first but there is a clear difference in my writing now than at the end of high school. My arguments and ideas are presented in a much more intelligent way and I am much better about being able to flow from idea to idea and paragraph to paragraph.
I quit writing introductions to start my essays, instead waiting until my body paragraphs have been written and then using the sum of their parts to decide on what my central thesis for the essay should be. All of the introductions I had written never matched up with my body paragraphs so I had to go back in and rewrite them every time. It saves time for me and also allows me more room to write in for my body paragraphs because I am no longer trying to write them to a pre-established central theme that may not reflect my thoughts by the end of the writing process. If I hadn’t have taken one last look over my essay on conventions of the western genre I would have actually forgotten to write a conclusion.
I still need to work on my ability to present my ideas in a more detailed manner and to do a better job of going in depth so that I can describe them to their full complexity. There are definitely times when ideas don’t come to fruition when I write. I believe that it is just an issue of revising. With every revision my work becomes a little bit better, and usually taking a few days between revisions helps even more. Taking a little bit of time off lets me generate new ideas and approach my work from different angles when I edit.
There is no issue in my ability to present my ideas but when it comes time to go into their individual details I believe that I need to provide more direct examples and still need to elaborate and clarify my ideas at a higher level. In my essay on genres I believe that I provided too few examples form western films. Not only that, I needed to do a better job of setting up the scenes in the essay so that the reader could understand what I was talking about. Since film is a visual art there would have been plenty of opportunities for me to provide descriptive detail, however I just
I think that if I can learn to write less in generalizations and focus on distinct incidents I will be able to improve my clarity and come to a sharper conclusion than before. I felt myself getting closer to do this when I wrote my discourse community ethnography because I had to be so specific on my topic. I started out writing in very broad terms talking about all of baseball as a central theme, but then I realized the best way that I could explain things and demonstrate to my readers what the true conventions of baseball were could only come through focusing on a team I had played. It had to be this way for two reasons. First off I had direct experience with the team and therefore could speak directly to it and secondly I was able to focus on the behaviors of my teammates which was much easier than the behaviors of athletes in the entire sport.

Finding America an Ocean Away

In 2005 my father, a pilot in the Air Force was stationed in Ramstein Germany, and my family and I moved overseas with him. Living in a foreign nation, western films reminded me of home. Their stories are centered on romantic idealization of the American West. Full of hope and adventure, there is an outlaw around every turn, and adventure just beyond the horizon. Many native Germans had never been to America thought that movies like “Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid” or “True Grit” were accurate depictions of modern America. To me Western films gave me a sense of home and gave me a change of scenery for a few hours.
Western films were what made Hollywood successful in its early years and have become known the world over as the definitively American Genre of Film. Without westerns the film industry may not have been as popular and America would be missing a part of its cultural identity. It’s not hard to imagine cowboys and Indians or outlaws and sheriffs running around in the Wild West. The genre has developed several conventions that make the genre so easily recognizable. In “True Grit” the story line starts in the Great Plains but the characters travel all the way to the foothills of the Rocky Mountains. Another thing I grew to love about westerns is their distinctive sound. The genre was most popular in the 50’s and 60’s so the music in the movies comes from the era as well. DJANGO Unchained is a great example of this. DJANGO was produced in 2012 but the soundtrack sounds like it could have been written in the middle of the 20th Century. Finally the plots revolve around the triumph of good versus evil. In the end we almost always will see a final shootout, or a fight in which the noble cowboy comes out on top.
The Opening scene, and closing scenes to westerns are as iconic as the Statue of Liberty. Almost all Westerns start of with scenic views that capitalize on the grand scenery of the West. They usually do this with a wide-angle shot, a shot that encompasses a wide-open landscape giving a feeling of the freedom of the West. Open ranges, wide-open town streets, or sloping canyons are classic scenes to open a Western. I think that Djengo does an excellent job of this. The film starts with swooping views of the west and slowly comes to focus on a group of slaves chained together, one of which being Djengo. By starting the movie off like this a dark mood is set as we get a glimpse of some of the problems of the west and it sets the mood for the rest of the film. Typically at the end of most westerns the cowboy or hero exits the picture with their back facing the camera as the sun is going down in the background. This is known as riding off into the sunset, but can be done on train, by horse, by wagon, or by simply walking away. In some cases such as Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid the protagonists don’t get a chance to ride off but instead are gunned down. In the case of this movie, the two protagonists are gunned down in the middle of the street. The picture stops as soon as they are shot and then the screen changes color to reflect a sunset over a freeze frame of the two outlaws being impaled by rifle fire.
Usually westerns are set in dark and gritty lighting. This is down by underexposing the film lighting to create darker shadows in the foreground as well as the background. Most producers choose to do this to give a sense of how uncivilized the west was. Villains usually look like they have not bathed in their lives and live in the shadows. The dust from settlements and in towns is usually on display instead of cleaned up. It is supposed to be very obvious that every thing on the frontier has just recently been built, and extra attention is paid so that it is not overlooked how hard life is on the frontier.
The Western Genre uses the subgenre of country music known as western to fit into its films. Many of the sounds such as the whistle from the good the bad and the ugly are widely known to the general public even though most people would not recognize what movie it came from. The steel guitars, strong whistle sub vocals to imitate a cowboy’s yell, or the harmonica are almost always used in the soundtracks of western films. The twang and winey sound heard in many country songs is even heavier and often oversaturated in western film scores. More modern films such as DJANGO have introduced modern genres of music such as rap and rock to westerns, but still keep the distinctive instrumentation and twang that western country is known for.
Obviously living out on the frontier in a different era the characters in westerns dress differently than we do today. Characters in films are clothed as cowboys, miners, or as townsfolk. In “True Grit” the Texas Ranger, La Boeuf is wearing full chaps and a cowboy hat to over exemplify his Texan heritage.
One of the most famous conventions of the western genre is the good guy wearing a white cowboy hat riding his white horse going up against a black-hatted villain on his black horse. Originally this was done to make obvious to viewers who was good and who was bad when film was shown in black and white. In the age of color TV the tradition has kept, while not every horse is white and hats pristine, the protagonist tends to have a lighter colored horse and hat while the protagonists are much darker. “Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid” has a very interesting look at this convention. Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid are outlaws running from the law, but they wear the lighter colored hats. Since they are the protagonists in the film however, the producer chose to give them the light hats to inform the viewer that from our perspective we will consider them the good guys and root for them instead of the law. When in the film they are being tracked down by lawmen in the distance they appear to be a dark blur off in the distance to make them seem more menacing.
By virtue of their genre, westerns are generally set west of the Mississippi, can go as far south as Mexico, but typically will not venture north of the Mason Dixon line. There are a variety of settings that they can take place in, frontier towns to scenic and expansive ranges to rugged stretches of the badlands. Film directors can create a lot of meaning in their films by choosing their setting. The western genre has long used frontier towns as places where the bad guys meet the good guys. It’s not hard to imagine a scene where a few deputies run into a notorious villain in a saloon or a card player is shot down for cheating. Typically a Western with wide-open expanses will be much more positive than one that is filmed inside of a small town or in and out of the dark. The plot is also affected by what setting the movie is filmed in. Southwestern movies tend to deal with land and water rights while films that are shot on the plains, ie. “Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid” will be about adventure, trains, and Indians.
As a convention western films tend to revolve around maintaining order out on the frontier. The original “True Grit” is a perfect example. In a frontier town a man is shot down by one of his employed range hands. To avenge his death John Wayne playing Rooster Cogburn accompanied by a Texas ranger La Boeuf and the dead man’s daughter Eula, track the murderer into the frontier passing through various terrains and meeting many different types of people including Indians. The entire plot revolves around restoring justice to the frontier. The movie DJANGO provides another and interesting plot line. While through out the whole movie DJANGO is trying to rescue his wife from her slave owners we see that his character does some very evil things to get her back. Normally in most westerns the protagonist upholds high morals whether they are a part of the law or are an outlaw.
In my childhood Western Films were a way for me to feel attached to American culture while living in Germany. Their stories of the Wild West and perseverance of the American spirit are iconic in American pop culture. As a child 3000 miles from home, they made me feel like I was still in the states.

Help Received:

In class workshop

True Grit. Dir. Henry Hathaway Perf. John Wayne. Kim Darby. Glen Campbell. Paramount Pictures. 1969. Film.

Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. Dir. George Roy Hill. Perf. Paul Newman. Robert Redford. 20th Century Fox. 1969. Film.

DJANGO Unchained. Dir. Quentin Tarantino. Perf. Jamie Foxx. Christoph Waltz. Leonardo Dicaprio. Weinstein Company. 2012. Film.

Preface to the West Potomac Wolverines

In my discourse community ethnography I tried to explain what makes a good high school baseball team win. I didn’t look at star players or freaks of nature that can throw 100 mph, but instead focused on team chemistry. I also examine many of the quirks and unknown aspects of baseball that cannot be found in the rule books. I paid special attention to the language that ball players use and how they interact with each other and the officiating crew while on the field and in the dugout.
In my senior season at West Potomac I can remember playing with more distinct characters than any team before. We had our own language and our own culture to go with it. The coaches must have thought we were all insane.
We started out on a hot winning streak going 7-0 which at the point was a West Potomac record. We were great friends, hanging out together, but unfortunately started to get too relaxed. Once we were on top of the division we developed a sense of complacency and started to fall off. Teams we used to be able to beat started to look more fearsome. Once we lost our sense of greatness it was like our whole team fell apart, our chemistry was all gone and we started defeating ourselves with errors and a lack of confidence.
I look into what characteristics of the team made us who we were and why our season ended up the way it did.

24/7 Access to the life of Rat Nicholson