To define what rhetoric is, is rhetorical in itself. The knowledge on the subject is broad and each rhetor interprets its meaning differently. I tend to recognize rhetoric as an art form in which one human naturaly uses strategies to communicate and influence another human. Through this interaction there should be discourse as well as passion from either side of the exchange. With out the heart and strength behind each rhetors words, the argument is unconvincing and disconnected to the central point of communication. I believe that each human has a natural inclination to persuade others. we do this through empathy, confidence, credibility and trust. These are also known as Ethos, Logos, and Pathos. Without these reason behind our rhetorical communication, the statements we make mean nothing to whom we share them with. I always like to think of rhetorical “arguments” as an exchange of energy. Like every living entity that exerts energy, there is an equal and opposite reaction. Therefore, if I make an argument strong through my own passion (energy) behind it, then the impact of the audience is with me or against me with the same enthusiasm I give off. There is no pull if I do not push first. Within the form of rhetoric a lot more is involved to create the art. There is symbolism and other influences that create a freedom of interpretation in the hands of the audience. As a rhetor I allow for my audience to receive my argument and to view it as they please. With their own circumstances and environments to shape the opinions that will either join or fight me. That is the true beauty in the art of rhetoric. The fact that there is an infinite amount of ideas that can change, falsify, or accept my arguments is amazing. No human is perfect in rhetorical communication, but the journey to make the other view point think you are is what rhetoric truly is.
Help Received: History and Theory of Rhetoric Text Book
X_Anna McFarlane__
0 comments on “What is Rhetoric” Add yours →