I believe right now, I am more like Janet because like I said in my homework, I tend to pull information from my sources and use them to proof my point. Instead, I should be engaging in implementing deeper into the text. Roger looks at information as a conversation that has gone one before and after he has talked about it. It is like a candy bar, most people just look at it as something you eat. They do no think about all that goes into the bar such as advertising, the way the bar looks, and the history behind the bar. Janet would eat it and go on with her day. Roger would eat it and wonder what the heck he was eating, how did the candy bar come to be in his possession?