The essay written by famed painter and sculptor Jean Dubuffet, “Anticultural Position,” was recently introduced to me. Now before I rant in the direction one can deduce from the title of this blog essay, I would like to let it be known I do respect his position and his abilities as a writer as well as an artist. But the content of which this essay is comprised fundamentally goes against my views on life. Much of Dubuffet’s rhetoric deals with how man’s most primal and instinctual persona producing what he calls “savagery,” must be used in order to truly accomplish meaningful art. In my mind he is critiquing the occidental culture or western culture for being essentially too thoughtful.
At one point, precisely his third of six enumerated points he endeavors to convey his opposition with western culture, he discusses the thought process in which he believes erroneous for true art. Dubuffet believes that the underlying mistake of western culture concerns the formation of ideas. More specifically, he states that the “landing” of an idea for any purpose where it completes its development does not offer enough of a profound perspective as the “root” of a mental process before it has come to full fruition. For instance, the way I would describe what he trying to say is that instead of finalizing a thought before its consequential action, one should “catch” the thought before it has become a solidified idea. Another point in which he makes he chastises western culture for analyzing. He believes analyzing things, categorizing, breaking down entities in their substrata is not the way to go about art. Dubuffet’s core concepts contradict my entire resolve.
I am a biology major, a man of science, and like all other extant human beings, a product of human advancement throughout evolution. I am a passionate and avid proponent of the father of science, Aristotle. Aristotle taught the world that rational thought channeled into the tangible universe around us will allow human beings to achieve true wisdom. I take this Aristotelian philosophy to heart and Dubuffet is essentially crapping on it with his essay. It is the very essence of the human mind to think analytically, the observe the world around us, to solve problems. The fact that Dubuffet seems to think primitive man’s absence of our current societal position is something to be valued; this notion offends me.
Well, I have news for Mr. Dubuffet, only the smart survive and pass on their intellectual genes to next generation. Abstract and analytical thought brought us out of the caves and placed at the apex of intelligent life forms making us the dominant animal on the planet. We control our world today not as a result of physical adaptations, we rather pale in comparison in physical prowess to our mammalian kin; it is our minds that have guided us to this point in time. If we had stayed with this “savage” mindset that Dubuffet seems to idolize as superior, the very concept of art would not even exist because that is an intangible fiction created by advanced brains, the very brains that make us homo sapien sapiens.