Table 1 exhibits the correlation between shoulder abduction angle and hand grip spacing. Results show no significant relationship between shoulder abduction angle using the goniometer and hand spacing on the barbell (p > 0.05). Figure 1 displays a scatterplot representing the data.

Correlations with Goniometer and Hand Spacing
		ShldAbdAng	HandSpace
ShldAbdAng	Pearson Correlation	1	-.049
	Sig. (2-tailed)		.836
	N	20	20
HandSpace	Pearson Correlation	-.049	1
	Sig. (2-tailed)	.836
	N	20	20

Table 1: Correlation values between shoulder abduction and hand spacing

Table 2 shows the correlation between the shoulder abduction angles measured from the Dartfish 7.0 software and hand placing. Results show no significant relationship between shoulder abduction angle using the Dartfish 7.0 software and hand spacing on the barbell (p > 0.05).

Correlations with Video Angle and Hand Spacing
		VideoShAng	HandSpace
VideoShAng	Pearson Correlation	1	.346
	Sig. (2-tailed)		.136
	N	20	20
HandSpace	Pearson Correlation	.346	1
	Sig. (2-tailed)	.136
	N	20	20

Table 2: Correlation values between shoulder abduction angles with the goniometer and hand spacing.

Table 3 shows correlations between shoulder abduction angles measured from the goniometer and the Dartfish 7.0 software. Results show no significant relationship between the shoulder abduction angle using the goniometer and the Dartfish 7.0 software.

Correlations with Goniometer and Video Angle
		ShldAbdAng	VideoShAng
ShldAbdAng	Pearson Correlation	1	.298
	Sig. (2-tailed)		.202
	N	20	20
VideoShAng	Pearson Correlation	.298	1
	Sig. (2-tailed)	.202
	N	20	20

Table 3: Correlation values between shoulder abduction angles with the goniometer and the Dartfish 7.0 software.