I think for my definition of rhetoric a few things would have changed from the begining of class. I would keep that rheotric is a for of argument. What I would change would be that rhetoric is neutral and whether it is being used for good or bad comes from who the user is. I think I would add that rhetoric does not need to be writen or verbal and that it something that can be in other forms such as art or buildings. I think would also add that rhetoric needs to have some kind of background information to it to be effective and that some sort of knowledge helps sort out the good rhetors from bad rhetors.