Michael Gorski
ERH 321WX-01
Short assignment on Hamlet, Prince of Denmark
27 March 2015
Help Received: EasyBib to cite; Class Discusions
Life After Death: An Analysis of Early Modern English Perspective on Spirits
Part A.
During England’s early modern time period, the supernatural was a common cultural belief. People thought spirits were influential and active in the natural world and aligned themselves with either good or evil. This belief spawned from the biblical concepts of angels, demons, and purgatory. Constance Jordan’s chapter “Spiritual and Mental Life” summarizes and presents excerpts from this time period concerning the views of the behavior and nature of spirits and their interaction with the natural world. She highlights the works of Joseph Hall, a writer during the time period; Ludwig Lavater, a Swiss Protestant theologian; George Gifford, a Protestant minister; and Samuel Harsnett, a professor and clergyman of the time period. All of these authors argued and agreed with the existence of an interactive supernatural realm, but had varied perspectives on the nature of the spirits.
Many views exist concerning the nature and purpose of spirits in the natural world. Joseph Hall argued for the classic struggle between good and evil; and viewed the malevolent spirits as demons and the amicable as angels. He also advocated that spirits heavily influenced human behavior. Jordan presents an excerpt from Hall’s Meditation and Vows that focuses on the existence of spirits and their relation to human life. He described the good angels’ tasks as, “ever removing our hindrances from good and our occasions of evil, mitigating our temptations, helping us against our enemies, delivering us from dangers, comforting our sorrows, furthering our good purposes, and, at last, carrying up our souls to heaven (Hall, Meditations and Vows, 159).” The demons had a different nature and seek to destroy the lives of men. Hall stated, “Provoke us to sin and plot mischiefs against us by casting into our way dangerous objects (Hall, Meditations and Vows, 159).” Gifford’s opinions concerning spirits mirrored those of Hall. The excerpts that Jordan selected solely focused on the evil spirits. Gifford provided more detail concerning the physical make-up of a spirit, their origin, and how demons select their targets. He described them as “hath neither flesh nor bones (Gifford, A Discourse of…Devils, 165).” Although Gifford’s excerpt focused mostly on demons, he does reference the supremacy of angels and good over evil. He also described how demons sought their victims. Availability was the key factor in choosing those to influence for malice. The soul must be willing. Hall and Gifford’s views differed from the opinions of Lavater.
Lavater espoused that spirits were occupants of purgatory, a Catholic belief of a supernatural realm where people pay of their sins until Judgment Day and they were seeking retribution. They maintained a quid pro quo relationship with humans that allowed for their release from purgatory and a reward for the human. Lavater also argued that spirits from hell were used to morally redirect lost sinners. Lavater does not deny the existence of angels, but purports that those supernatural beings interacting with humans are merely deceased individuals.
Jordan addresses an opinion of the time period that there was no spiritual world. These individuals believed that the appearance of ghosts were hallucinations and evidence of lunacy. False spiritual encounters were a frequent occurrence and this led certain parts of the population to hold a more rational ideal. Jordan addresses this belief with excerpts from Lavater and Harsnett. Lavater agreed that a portion of the population held the rational view that chalked ghosts up the mental tricks and hysteria. He argued that this is the exact opposite the realm of the supernatural is active in man’s life. Harsnett investigated false exorcisms that were used for show and eventually came to the conclusion that they existed for solely for the theater. His argument challenges the existence of the supernatural and more specifically their interaction with man.
The English developed many opinions concerning the supernatural. Early modern English culture was biblically focused and the most prominent idea viewed spirits as angels and demons. The angels worked to better the lives of men, while the demons sought to destroy man and distance him from God. Another biblical perspective focused on the inhabitants of purgatory and hell. Some believed that spirits were deceased humans that sought retribution on earth or as warnings concerning the afterlife. In contrast, a scientific and rational view argued that the supernatural was figment of the imagination or signs of delusion. Overall, the supernatural realm played a major role in influencing the culture of early modern England.
Part B.
In Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, he challenges the common cultural perception of supernatural interaction with the natural world. An opinion in early modern England was supernatural phenomena were not real. Instead, what people perceived as interaction with spirits were merely products of the imagination. Along with imagination, people attributed seeing and interacting with spirits to mental illness. These two beliefs spawned from the occurrence of false supernatural experiences. Shakespeare challenges the existence of spirits and the supernatural through the nature of the interactions of Hamlet Senior’s spirit with other characters. His interactions with his father’s ghost are responsible for the development of his plot for revenge against Claudius and the eventual decline of his mental stability. Shakespeare utilizes the interaction with the supernatural between Hamlet and his deceased father to challenge the accepted notion that the supernatural existed.
The manner in which Shakespeare presents the ghosts provides room for inquiry concerning its existence. Hamlet Senior’s ghost appears to Marcellus, Bernardo, and Horatio in Act One, Scene One during their evening guard shift. The ghost is asked by the men on guard to speak, but it does not obey their commands. Later in Act One, Scene Four, Hamlet is brought by Horatio to view the ghost during a guard shift. Hamlet observes the spirit and answers the ghosts request to follow itself. In the next scene, Hamlet and his father’s ghost are alone when he describes the crimes of Claudius to his son and convinces Hamlet to exact revenge. The circumstances surrounding the ghost’s introduction are unusual, because Hamlet is the sole communicator with this entity. Other characters merely view the ghost and there is no interaction.
Act Three, Scene Four is central to Shakespeare’s challenging of ghosts. Hamlet is talking to his mother concerning her treachery and Claudius’ crimes. During the course of their argument, the ghost of Hamlet’s father enters the room and Hamlet tries to convince his mother that the ghost is there, but she will not believe him. The queen says, “This is the very coinage of your brain. This bodiless creation of ecstasy is very cunning in (Shakespeare, Act 3, Scene 4, Lines 139-141).” She attributes the claims against her new husband and Hamlet’s talk of ghosts to be figments of his imagination. After interacting with the ghost and being labeled as a lunatic by his mother, Hamlet randomly kills Polonius. This incident alludes to the idea that the spirit of his father is an idea created by Hamlet. The increased decline of his mental facilities and his continued obsession with revenge creates an image for the audience that Hamlet is becoming a lunatic and the spirit is nonexistent.
Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Prince of Denmark seeks to challenge the cultural belief in the supernatural with the interactions between the ghost and other characters. His depiction of Hamlet’s decline in mental health creates the concept that the ghost is not an actual ghost, but a figment of his imagination. The spirit gives him an avenue escape from the grief of his father’s death and it developed out of the grief. Shakespeare challenges the audience to consider the reality of the supernatural during the early modern English time period.
Works Cited
Jordan, Constance. “Spiritual and Mental Health.” William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. 2nd ed. New York: Pearson/Longman, 2005. 157-80. Print.
Shakespeare, William, and Constance Jordan. William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. 2nd ed. New York: Pearson/Longman, 2005. Print.