Cadet A did really well explaining what he has improved on and then explaining where he started to where he finished. That is my plan for my paper. I plan on picking out a few skills that I feel I have improved on in this semester, and then explain to my audience where I started at the beginning of the year and what got me to where I was at the end of the year. I like how for his examples he integrated quotes of his past assignment and immediately after gave a explanation of the quote and how that part of the assignment helped develop him as a writer.

 

Cadet B was similar to Cadet A and used quotes as his main source of his argument. He went on to describe an assignment that he did in class and analyzed the good parts and the parts that he needed to improve on in regards to addressing his audience. I like this approach of analyzing a single assignment rather then comparing multiple assignments like Cadet A. I might think about using this tactic after reading this because I think it flowed really well and was a unique approach to the reflection.

 

Cadet C  has the most interesting refection because he goes back all the way to his 7th grade class and shows how he has developed his complexity of writing ever since then. I think that this student was very well organized and had good language and a clear argument for his audience. I would definitively like to emulate his language and clarity but I think I will stick with the traditional way of reflection and use multiple assignments from my class and analyze what skills I effectively used and good better at since the beginning of my writing journey, similar to Cadet B. (My thesis/Introductions and clear arguments were what I think I have improved on, but I now need to work on making sure my evidence is effective and organized effectively)