Andy Warhol’s effect on Art Business and the Early Music Scene.

While many people know about Andy Warhol and the effect his artwork and style had on the contemporary art movement in the 1960’s, people are generally unaware of the influence he had on early American rock bands of the same era.  The late 50’s and early 60’s were a time of change for the art industry in the United States and the U.K..   Contemporary artworks (what some saw as trash at the time) was becoming more and more popular among younger generations.  Not only were the works in galleries changing, but the music was changing as well.  Arguably one of the most influential bands of this period was The Velvet Underground, a band founded in New York City which would be sky-rocketed to fame with the help of their producer, Andy Warhol, and his ‘Business Art.’

Warhol’s idea behind business art came from his idea that he didnt run his art business, his art business ran him, that helped him realize that business art is the best art.  Andy Warhol Enterprises, Andy’s company, was a movie making company.  With the movies his company made, came out-takes, and with these out-takes, came an idea.  Andy loved these out-takes, what he called leftovers, and he thought in some cases they were better (funnier) than the actual films.  He needed to find something to do with them, and that is where The Velvet Underground came in.

The Velvet Underground gained their fame once Andy Warhol became their manager and the band became part of his Exploding Plastic Inevitable showcase.  Andy used his influence in the art scene in New York to promote The Velvet Underground, and then he found out what to do with his leftovers-project the broken bits of film over the band as they played.  This, combined with the Undergrounds imitable style produced an act that was the first of its kind and was a true combination of visual and performative arts.  Andy was taking the style from the happenings and creating music showcases which began to involve the audience more and more.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFd9h5IG5XQ

With these shows, Warhol was able to influence new musical artists such as Pink Floyd, David Bowie and Peter Gabriel to escape the norm of music of the period and turn it not only into a harmonious, but a visual and performative act as well.  Warhol’s influences can still (arguably, I must say) be seen in bands like Gwar, and Slipknot as they are not only attacking and changing music, but are changing the physical and performative aspect as well, much like the early contemporary artists of the 60’s did with art.

 

Allan Kaprow, Jackson Pollock, and #Happenings

Allan Kaprow was one of the pioneers of performance art, and what were known as “Happenings” in the 50’s and 60’s.  Kaprow was an art teacher and a figurehead in the early years of Contemporary Art.

His article The Legacy of Jackson Pollock was one that was quite interesting, and truly brought to light the spirit of Jackson Pollock, and why his painting techniques were so remarkable.  To get a better feel for Pollock, I watched some of the Jackson Pollock documentary.

In this, it not only talks about Pollock as a painter, but it also talks about his life.

After gaining a better understanding of Pollock’s life, I was better able to grasp where he got the inspiration for his work-nowhere.  Jackson Pollocks painting was truly a release for him, a way of letting go of whatever stresses or good feelings he had.

Moreover, his paintings were not constricted to the page and in no way could be replicated, much the Happenings in New York.  “Happenings are,” as Kaprow puts them, “events that, put simply, happen.”

The best way I can imagine a Happening is an outdoor concert, just imagine:

Its June 16th, Phish, a world renowned jam-band, is getting ready to play.  The setlist has been agreed upon two weeks in advance.  Right before Phish is scheduled to come on stage the sound of thunder is heard and it begins to pour.  This my friends, is (in some ways) a Happening.  Kaprow loosely defines a happening as a performance art that has a set of planned out notes with what the artist knows will happen, and the artist keeps in their head, what they hope will happen.  This hope  is what is known as chance.  Chance, not spontaneity, is something that implies risk and fear and not exactly knowing what will happen next, only having a hopeful idea, along with the risk and fear which chance implies.

Kaprow says that Happening “simply happen,” so really there is almost no clear certainty regarding any of these works, much like the works of Jackson Pollock.  His paintings were abstract, yet he must have had some sort of plan, much like the Happenings.  Happenings did not only contain what the artist meant for them to, they also held the audience, and everything the audience brought with them (formal knowledge or ideas, not car keys, purses, etc..) and so did Pollocks paintings.  His paintings not only were huge, but they extended out into the rest of the space they were in; in other words, much like his paintings, while impossible to reproduce, happenings were everywhere and embodied everything around them.