Both Harney and Frost have been highly criticized for the ways in which they depict Appalachian people in their articles. Do you find the depictions problematic? If not, why not? If so, in what ways? For this answer, you should not merely discuss your impressions, but you should use specific examples from each text to back up your claims. In other words, what specific passages support your assertions and how?

 I feel that both Harney and Frost romanticized the idea of Appalachian culture greatly. In my opinion, it does sound scenic and a life style that is not as hectic as living in a modern world, but there are still burdens that those living there must bear. Living in the Appalachian culture is not as scenic or relaxing as the two made it sound. Those who live there do not have much money, much food, healthcare, or a stable shelter. To “go without” may not be a choice made easily for them. Though they have a means for survival, it is not simple or relaxed work. The food they find and grow and trade for is enough to sustain them, such as the small amount of wheat flower the girl produced to show the university student.  What they have is not enough to prosper and thrive. Though the people of Appalachia have found ways to make a life for several generations, it has not been as easy or comfortable as Harney and Frost spin it to be. For some, they have no choice because they were born into large families with little money, like Frost says; it is a reminder of the pioneers. Because of this situation there is little chance for anyone to break free from the lifestyle if they choose to or even have the desire to. -KCD