I feel that the members of the Kriesau Circle felt a deep-lying sense of loyalty to their home country, and as such, the object of the resistance was to overthrow the nazi government. At their disposal, they had high ranking military officials, members of the nazi party, and numerous scholars, all offering a different outlook towards the resistance.
Monthly Archives: December 2015
Valkyrie Film Review
The film Valkyrie, in my opinion, was surprisingly historically accurate. With the climax of the film being the assassination attempt own Hitler in 1944, the film was quite moving with powerful performances by lead actors and actresses, who did well to portray the severity of their actions. For example, the wife of the protagonist (Col. Claus von Stauffenberg) hardly says anything during the movie, but you can see the worry she has for her husband. Tom Cruise, who plays Col. Stauffenberg, does an excellent job playing a stoic military man with incredibly strong resolve, one with undoubted faith to his beloved Fatherland.
Relating to GR-331, this movie was as accurate as can be. From actual quotes from General Tresckow to Stauffenberg’s aid jumping in front of the firing squad, this movie achieved its goal of informing the public that the first country that the Nazi’s invaded was in fact Germany, and that not all citizens were willing to follow Hitler blindly.
Resistance as Civilian or Military
1. The goals of the civilian resistance were to not only overthrow Hitler, but plan for a government after the Nazi Party. They’re priorities were setting up a future government, one they felt better represented the german people than the Nazi’s did.
2. The Military resistance had the same goal to overthrow Hitler, yet they had different reasons. From a Militaristic perspective, Hitler did not know what he was talking about, and as such, lost a lot of respect from his higher command. Therefore, the main goal was to overthrow Hitler for the dignity of the Military, not necessarily for a future government.
3. The obstacles faced by each were similar. They both faced an overwhelmingly intimidating presence of the SS and the Gustapo, constantly being monitored by both. As such, everything they did had to kept in utmost secrecy.
Military side-obstacles faced by the Military were more honor bound. Upon commissioning, they swore an oath of allegiance to Hitler, so they had an internal struggle fighting sworn oaths while committing high treason act of high treason.
Civilian side-Gustapo, SS, and putting family/loved ones at risk.
4. In a sense, I think that the resistance both succeeded and failed at the same time., They succeeded in raising awareness within their own state of Hitler’s atrocities, yet could not do anything with such a strict form of government. The Military side failed in succeeding to assassinate Hitler, yet in doing so made it clear to the world that not all of Germany were blindly following someone as evil as Hitler.
Oath to the Nazi Resistance
On my honor, I will do my duty to God and my country, and hereby swear allegiance to sacred Germany. I will strive towards a better nation, one without Hitler, one without tyranny, one without a Nazi Regime, and will pledge my life to this cause, so help me God.
Adam von Trott: A Short Lived Conspiracy
Adam Von Trott lived an incredibly short, courageous life of 35 years. Born into a well-established family, his father was an official in the Prussian civil services. Von Trott was an accomplished German, and as such was well respected amongst several resistance groups in Nazi Germany. Adam von Trott was a true German patriot who was not afraid to oppose Hitler, and felt he had a self-bound duty towards his home country.
Trott’s first encounter with Hitler came as an audience member. As a young man of 17, he recognized that Hitler was a force to be reckoned with, however could not fathom why the audience was so engulfed in his ideals. Following his ambitions of becoming a lawyer, he went on to study at Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar in 1931. Two years later, as the Nazi Party was gaining momentum and prominence, he decided to go back to his native Germany due to his unfailing sense of loyalty. Operating within Germany, he found success to be limited, since he was not a member of the Nazi party. In 1937, he started traveling again, and this time crossed the Atlantic Ocean to see various friends and contacts within the United States. Upon his journey, he takes a keen interest in human rights (as the most basic of human rights were stripped in then Nazi-Germany). However, throughout his voyage, he was often mistaken for a spy and was subsequently followed by the FBI. Nothing comes of it, and he has several meaningful conversations while he was in the U.S. Continuing his travels, he went on to see China, Korea, and even Manchuria-until his father’s death, upon which he returned to Germany.
Adam von Trott’s travels were all for one reason: resistance to the Nazi Regime. He was constantly trying to gain support everywhere he went, constantly trying to raise awareness of what was brewing in Germany. The true purpose of his travels was to gain knowledge, knowledge of how to go about opposing Hitler. He visited Karl Brandt, an old friend who fled Germany upon the Nazi Party gaining prominence, and held quite a meaningful conversation, in which they were in strong disagreement. Von Trott was convinced that “a decisive anti-Nazi revolution” was coming soon, and this would prevent another world war. In this case, von Trott shows his naivety for his native country. Brandt promptly argues, assuring him that war is coming, and once the U.S. becomes involved, they will stop at nothing to bring down Nazi Germany. Brandt knew just how violent this imminent war would be, and perhaps even exposed Trott’s naïveté. Soon after his meeting with Brandt, he returned to Germany until 1939, when he traveled to London. There he met with the Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, to discuss political cooperation with the German government on the position of arresting Hitler, if the Germans could indeed pull it off.
This goes to show that von Trott’s priorities were to his state, not to his government. He felt an extreme sense of loyalty to Germany and none for Hitler. He felt he was born to serve his country, not to die for it (even though that is essentially how it all played out). He wanted Germany to still be respected even though a mad man was leading it. Adam von Trott’s priorities were clear. His main goal was to rid his sacred Germany of their tyrant Leader, and to restore it to a sensible form of democracy.
Dorothy Thompson: A published Resistance
Dorothy Thompson was quite the influential figure in her time. In 1939, she was recognized nationally as the second most influential woman in the United States (behind Eleanor Roosevelt), according to Times magazine. By some, she is even regarded as the “First Lady of American Journalism” (Eleanor Roosevelt Papers Project, 2011). In her time, she was well respected and at the top of her game. However, one of the most influential times in her career saw her playing key role in the German resistance.
Dorothy Thompson was born in the year 1893, and was from the state of New York. She graduated in 1914 and studied Politics and Economics. Upon graduating university, she became heavily involved in Woman’s Suffrage up until 1920, when she moved abroad to pursue a career in journalism. In 1927, she was stationed in Germany as the head of the Berlin Bureau of the New York Post. It was here where she saw two different Germany’s, a republic and a dictatorship.
Being in Germany in the early 1930’s meant that Dorothy Thompson had a firsthand account of the Nazi rise to power. However, she witnessed a different kind of government before this extreme party. This government was called the Weimar Republic. Currency in this republic meant nothing, and the exchange rate was ridiculously high, with one American dollar worth 4.21 trillion German marks (Economics and politics in the Weimar Republic, 2002). Needless to say, this was worthless for the German people, and they found better value in the currency by burning it for warmth. German nationalism was at an all-time low. This was no surprise, since they were just off the back of an enormous defeat in an industrial war that seemingly pitted the entire world against them. The Germans felt hard done by this, yet could not rally behind anyone or anything.
Amongst all of the inner turmoil in post WWI Germany, Hitler was the biggest beneficiary. He was able to oust the communist party through a conspiracy trial, and while he was never voted into office by a public majority vote, he was popular amongst the German people. Dorothy Thompson, adroit in the field of journalism, quickly recognized his rise to power and as such, was the first foreign reporter to interview Hitler. She wrote in I saw Hitler! in 1932, “When I walked into Adolph Hitler’s salon in the Kaiserhof hotel, I was convinced that I was meeting the future dictator of Germany. In something like fifty seconds I was quite sure that I was not. It took just about that time to measure the startling insignificance of this man who has set the world agog.” Thompson made it blatantly clear she was not impressed by the Austrian soon-to-be dictator. She was not at all expecting to meet with such a man she described as “faceless” and “formless” (I saw Hitler!, 1932). Even though she egregiously underestimated Hitler, it is not hard to see why. What Thompson saw in Hitler was insignificance, a mere radical with big ambitions without the political prowess to fulfill his endeavors. She remarked “In personal intercourse he is shy, almost embarrassed. […] He gives the impression of a man in a trance” (I saw Hitler!, 1932). Although Thompson did not think much of Hitler, a short year after the article was printed Hitler had seized power and the atrocities (not well known at the time) started to appear. Aware of her mistake, Thompson frantically started to publish various articles, desperately trying to inform the world how Hitler was defeating his opponents and persecuting the Jews. In 1934, she was ordered to leave Germany, and was the first foreign reporter to be ordered out of the country. It made world news.
Dorothy Thompson had a unique view of Germany in the 1920’s and the 1930’s. She was able to differentiate between the aforementioned Weimar Republic and the dictatorship under Adolph Hitler. Thompson recognized that Germany was a defeated nation under the Weimar Republic. Then, once the Nazi Party came along, she observed a gradual change in the German people, but not for the better. It was not a warranted sense of belief, but rather a dumb sense of loyalty, where the public would blindly follow the Nazi Party into anything. In one example, she noticed a banner strung up in a Hitler Youth Camp that deeply perturbed her. That banner read “You were born to die for Germany.” This scared her, as it was a camp full of little kids, ordering them to die for the country because that was what they were born to do. She interpreted this banner as representative of the changes wrought by the Nazi’s. The days of inflation and depression were replaced with brutal efficiency and evil scare tactics. The shift in government went from one extreme to another, with neither change truly “for the people.” The Weimar Republic was inflated with too many political parties, while no one party could speak on behalf of the public. On the other hand, the Nazi Regime was an extremist dictatorship where anyone who spoke out against the party were quickly silenced and sentenced to life in a concentration camp. Thompson even remarked as the war dragged on, that the Germans weren’t necessarily fighting for Hitler, but they were “fighting because a lost war meant a lost nation” (Col. Sunnen, 2015). She recognized that the Nazi rise to power only meant destruction for the German people, and she legitimately sympathized for them.
Dorothy Thompson played a key role in the Resistance through the publication of Hitler’s atrocities and spreading the word about the evils of the Nazi Party. Her actions were genuine and meaningful, because she truly felt for the Germans. Proof of this was illustrated when she wrote “It must be said, it must be re-iterated that there has been and still is a widespread terror, which extends throughout the whole of Germany.” As such, she felt she needed to do something (for the German people, not for Germany). Her work still speaks volumes today on what journalism should be: standing up for what is right and fighting against what is wrong.