ERH-102 Essay 4: Common Reflective Essay

Cadet Peter Chew

ERH-102-02

Professor Dupal

December 14, 2022

 

Paving The Road ahead: A Reflective Essay on my Semester Work of Written Essays.

My time as a student in the course Writing & Rhetoric II (ERH-102) for the fall semester of 2022, has thus far been quite a journey of self-improvement. My writing skills naturally have usually been all over the place, switching back in forth between a simple and concise style of writing to complex, old-fashioned, opinionated pieces comprised of tangents, and run-on sentences along with attempts to write with elegant words to further enhance the validity of my arguments. After indulging in a self-analyze of my performance and of the previous semesters, I have noticed that overall, my writing has steadily enhanced to a higher standard. However, I will touch upon some of the writing problems and significant improvements made this semester.

My writing encountered several problems, lack of proper time management, and an unbalancing of my study schedule made it complicated for me to think and concern properly as a writer when writing the essays. As a result, my unproductivity, made me put them off for days. Such behavior cost me time and ideas, which I have learned to notice, and I have come to grips to suppress such feelings of procrastination. I seem to work at my most productive peak during the early morning before most is awake during this period I was able to catch up on late essays and complete them with confidence.

Writing in an ample time block has been quite a challenge for me, usually, my writing process is categorized by working on my paper during intervals through the afternoon to over a week, it usually depends, and at times even longer if I find myself unable to process any ideas needed to write my paper. Nonetheless, time management has been a troubling issue for me, and further associated with unsettled self-discipline has made it quite unpredictable regarding productivity. Much of my formal education was spent learning how to write in both the English grammar structure and the Portuguese grammatical structure, and because of the differences between the languages along with syntax rules, and so on. Has made my writing not as concise as I would like it to be. The Portuguese language has quite a standard format for writing essays which still is somewhat different from the more direct, simple, and concise style of the English language.

Another issue I encountered was attempting to write essays in the new “delayed thesis” approach which is a centerpiece of ERH-102 to make the students learn how to stop writing the thesis at the top of the page but present it close to the end of the essay. A new style of writing, where writers use “hooks” to draw in the audience and focus their attention at hand leading them towards the thesis. I had quite a challenge with this approach. Not only is the format different, but there is more of an emphasis on the proper usage of rhetorical strategies to further indulge the reader in the contents of the essay, and a convincing argument.

When it came to the quality of my essays. For instance, my second essay for the course to my surprise was not exactly how I expected to be received with a grade of seventy-two out of a hundred –– unaware of the grammatical mistakes, and off-topic tangents that occurred several times throughout the essay, mixing the proposal style paper with the delayed thesis topic of the second essay. The topic that I choose for that paper was “Are tech giants obligated to promote freedom of speech? Are they exempt because they are private companies? (Chew, 2022). I found writing the paper to be quite a challenge, trying to piece it all together into one central theme that begs the question. The research and readings on the subject were also quite interesting, and I learned some important information regarding how the first amendment and other laws of the American legal system work regarding the protection of the civil liberties of freedom of expression.

            Writing a delayed thesis for the first time was quite a mess, the unconventional style completely goes against what I have been taught throughout the entirety of my formal schooling, yet I took the task head on. Constructing a claim and bringing in supportive arguments further enhanced by rhetorical strategies of Pathos, Ethos, and Logos are key ingredients to any paper that is intended to convince the reader of something. Writing such strategies and looking for where my thesis would be written made it odd, and consequently too jumbled for the reader.

I have learned and continue to improve each time I am handed a writing assignment, despite the errors I have made in the process of writing, some being quite basic for my level. Has allowed me to catch such mistakes more efficiently, especially when re-reading my essays to myself making it supremely clearer to see mistakes and spot off-topic sprees. As the semester rushes to a dashing end, I can say with confidence that I am more aware and mature as a writer, and with that my writing will be at a higher standard as I continue to practice and write more, as I tackle the endeavors of writing for the next semesters to come and my continued journey as a student with a passion for literature and writing.

Works Cited

Chew, Peter. Essay 2: Delayed Thesis Argument “Are tech giants obligated to promote freedom of speech? Are they exempt because they are private companies?” 3 Nov. 2022. Writing and Rhetoric II, The Virginia Military Institute, Student pap

ERH-102-02 Essay 3 – Proposal

Cadet Peter Chew

ERH-102-02

Professor Dupal

November 11, 2022

Assignment: Essay 3: Writing a Proposal Argument.

 

Wrongful Removal of Civil War Era Memorial Monument from VMI

The Virginia Military Institute –– a long-standing grail of tradition, a symbol for those who sought an adverse lifestyle, a gateway to a disciplined regime catered to those who do not seek to be or do ordinary. A mission to achieve above and beyond in the aspects of military, academic, and athletic excellence; a cadetship served for mostly four years, the precious time to mold an individual into a citizen-soldier instilled with the values of the Institute. The school has a deep-rooted history, not only in the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia but one in which its members made on several occasions lasting impacts on the nation. Its graduates and members of the VMI community have served in both the public and private sectors, many have reached good fortune, and few have achieved immortality in the place of history. Such as George C. Marshall who is perhaps the highest exemplary figure of modern-era VMI, such a lasting influence on his life had been expected from each Cadet. This issue concerns several groups, most predominately the Corp of Cadets, as they are the most impacted by the culture and environment. Such monuments and the context of history set the foundation for organizational culture, and once something is removed or changed that had significant importance is dealt with negative morale and backlash, which is exactly what occurred when “Stonewall Jackson was removed from Post. The Alumni concerned about change are unquestionably divided between being supportive or unsupportive of the removal decision. There is a divide in the community, which could be alleviated by praising both Marshall and Stonewall. Instead of erasing one from the equation due to political correctness.

The cadets who fought and died on May 15, 1864, in the Battle of New Market, numbering 257 were organized into a battalion and marched off to battle against Union troops. Ten cadets were killed in battle or died later from their wounds and were buried on VMI grounds, a memorial statue of her lady Virginia mourning the death of those cadets, the keystone whose names are inscribed as a sign of immortalizing their names and giving honorary respect. The participants who continue to be memorialized paid ceremonial respect on the date the battle occurred. (Kludy, VMI). Despite the media outlash, with the suggestion to remove the memorial, it was graciously rejected. And thus the ceremony continues to exist and is attended by all Cadets, where all pay their respect and admiration –– not to the confederate army that they fought with, such ideal is cleansed from the ceremony; all focus is instead centered on the bravery of such young boys who as Cadets continued marching towards the Union soldiers while receiving a cannonade from Union artillery, whom some as a result, unfortunately, died on the field of honor –– “The field of honor” that itself is has a double meaning among cadets, one previous describe while the other being one of several words and terms that are unique to the VMI community, which apart from its formal usage, is usually used as an informal wit among Cadets with a connotation that describes a moment in which someone has either “passed out” during a long, past and review parade, or “fell out” of a heinous high-intensity physical workout. Terms and language which continue to live and be used among the community, terms that originated from the era of the Civil War. It becomes clearer where this rooted culture originates. The culture of the civil war makes the rooted existence of the Corp of Cadets, the lifestyle, and the way of life of a Cadet today, living in the same Barracks they once slept, the similarities are a glimpse into the same footsteps of those Cadets, of an ancestorial tree to the modern equivalent of the Corp of Cadets.

The problem could be resolved by a return of the memorial statue that stood beside the cadet battery, which he proudly overlooked over the institute to which he so proudly served and devoted himself. Ideally, with the support of the VMI Alumni association, along with a decision from the Board of Visitors (BOV), The statute should be returned to its original spot beside the cadet battery. And it should emphasize that the figure of Stonewall Jackson is not praised or romanticized. Simply a matter of respect toward the character of the man, his leadership, personal virtues, his immense respect earned by those who served under him, Cadets, Alumni who died, and who were a part of such a defining moment in American History. Because there is more behind men than the organization one is a part of.  Most figures in history have some type of bad deed which society tends to pass off and instead focuses on the more admirable aspects. This does not mean that the issue of slavery and racism in the South should be discredited. However, the subject that pertains to VMI and Jackson is not one of slavery, but one of his careers as a professor, instructor, Leader, and exemplary figure who made an honorable name for himself during the war, that is among southerners. Ironically enough Jackson was a graduate of West Point, yet the academy is not blamed, nor should it be for the sins and cause for which Jackson fought and the same courtesy should be extended to VMI.

                     Furthermore, some context behind the origins of the Statue opens another issue at hand that should be worthy of criticism and outrage, particularly of the decision of its removal. It has a deeper meaning than just representing a “Confederate Figure” who taught at the institute. The Statue itself was made by Sir Moses Ezekiel, “the first Jewish Cadet from VMI”, (Col. Wyatt, 2020), a veteran of New Market who was a student under Stonewall’s time as Professor, (Baskind, 2021). And if any posses: notion of the Jewish Religion and its Laws, one must realize that it is prohibited to craft an image of man, a statue which signifies flesh and blood is not permitted, for God must be the only one praised by mankind. A sculptor Sir Moses Ezekiel gave to VMI his work of art, “It is Old Stonewall himself as he scanned the enemy on the field of Manassas”. He was praised for his devotion to duty, his figure as a man: “The Jew, breaking the long tradition of his race, which forbade the making of a graven image, interpreting aright the spirit of his ancient law, has lent his splendid genius to perpetuate in bronze the image of a Gentile, and Christian, and his comrade in war, Stonewall Jackson.”, (Rockbridge County Newsprint, 1912)…, a breaking of tradition to present praise to a man highly respected by his comraderies, to have an Artwork crafted by a talented Jewish sculptor that gave the highest praise, a breaking of his own religious adherence to signify respect to a Confederate General is quite avant-garde for today’s political tolerance if that is not enough a statement that a man himself earned such respective by the people of that time.

Therefore, Jackson deserves proper dignity in principle to what the memorial was originally intended for, not praise of a lost cause, but the totality of a man who earned the respect, and for the following reasons: he was the first faculty member to die since the founding of VMI in November 1839. His body was brought to Lexington, where the Corps of Cadets escorted the body of the fallen soldier, professor, and their former commander carried to his old classroom where it lay in state with cadets humbly standing as guards over their fallen teacher. Along with a proper salute, where his pride and dignity were further evaluated by The Cadet Battery gun salutes which fired from sunrise to sunset. Stonewall was admired for his character as a leader, professor, and scholar –– a commander who inspired the men under his care, his ability to instill inspiration and bravery in troops, through his display of courage and stubbornness won him many a battle. A showcase of his tactical cleverness on the battlefield, are all personal traits of character that allowed him to command and conquer effectively, a general of the Confederacy forces and the cause for which he fought he nevertheless his biggest blunder, despite the cause of behalf in which he died for. the complexity of his story, like many others is much more complex than what is typically assumed of in surface-level mainstream understanding of the subject.

It is unquestionable that VMI has a rooted history from the Confederacy and Civil War era, as to most southern institutions of that time. It is simply something that cannot be denied or rejected. The issue of The Civil War itself is a troubling, decisive topic –– with two commonly debated arguments in academia, within the field of politics and history, the debate between the true motive of why the Confederacy broke away from the Union and the underlining motive that caused motivation for a bloody conflict between brothers, an instance before separation was merely the same country, to be eventually divided by politics. One side preferable to presenting a “cleaner” and innocent version of the confederacy, claiming the war was fought on behalf of “State Rights”, followed by “Northern aggression”, which is true, but usually misinterpreted and used as a propaganda piece to promote confederation revisionism. The other side of the argument is the most understood in mainstream America, that the southern cause for war, was a motive for maintaining the inhumane right to slavery. Either way, as it is entailed with war, acts of evil were committed by both sides on several occasions greater than the other, and the narrative of righteousness is usually set by the victor. Nevertheless, the Civil War is an integral part of Southern History and identity, and with where VMI is located, clearly aligns with that part of history.

Historical figures from the past who are admired in society, are praised for the overall impression and contribution they left behind, usually not for their wrongs, but such wrongs are subjective to one’s opinion and moral compass. Exemplary figures in history have some element of bad deeds in their life. As it is human to err. None is perfect. And if by this logic all who were to be subject to censorship because of their involvement or existence with immoral behavior, would mean that several members of the Founding Fathers themselves, such as George Washington would have their monuments and name reprimanded from the American consciousness of praise. Someone such as Washington with such a high reputation to be expelled would-be grave devastation to the societal fabric and morale of the nation and the cultural foundation: all of which are symptoms of what the institute endured when Jackson was “Relocated”. It is morally wrong to remove a memorial that was chosen to be there by past generations, especially when such removal is motivated by politics. Caught in the storm of politics, a leaked picture of former governor of Virginia Ralph Northam was exposed by the media for doing blackface. The governor to not lose face, swept VMI under the rug, removed the previous administration, cleaned house in the BOV, and appointed “politically aligned” board members to enact changes that would come with the high backlash that made matters worse with the addition of new programs in line with the politically correct progressive agenda that comprises today’s overall collegial academia. One must understand that VMI is not comparable to other Colleges. It is a bastion of the past, of traditionalism, conservativism, of devotion to duty, God, and country. A fact that is the opposite to most academic institutions, not even the Service Academies embody the ideals that are construed by progressive entities to be as “backward thinking” than at VMI.

 

 

 

 

Works Cited:

Baskind, S. (2021, January 21). The Jewish sculptor of the Confederacy – Tablet Magazine. Arts & Letters section The Jewish Sculptor of the Confederacy. Retrieved December 14, 2022, from https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/arts-letters/articles/stonewall-jackson-moses-jacob-ezekiel-vmi

Col. Wyatt, Bill. “VMI Headlines 2020-2021: Boxing Adapts to COVID ERA – News – Virginia Military Institute.” VMI, 7 Dec. 2020, www.vmi.edu/news/headlines/2020-2021/vmi-begins-to-relocate-the-stonewall-jackson-statue.php.

Kludy, Mary Laura. “New Market Ceremony History.” VMI, www.vmi.edu/archives/manuscripts/new-market–vmi-in-the-civil-war/battle-of-new-market/new-market-ceremony-history/.

Memorial exercises at the unveiling of Sir Moses Ezekiel’s Statue of Stonewall Jackson, Virginia Military Institute June 19, 1912. Rockbridge County Newsprint, 1912.

Shapira, Ian. “At VMI, Black Alumni Want Stonewall Jackson’s Statue Removed. the School Refuses.” The Washington Post, WP Company, 10 Sept. 2020, https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2020/09/09/vmi-stonewall-jackson-statue/.

“Stonewall Jackson at VMI – VMI Museum – Virginia Military Institute.” VMI, www.vmi.edu/museums-and-archives/vmi-museum/stonewall-jackson-at-vmi/.

ERH-102 Essay 2: Delayed Thesis Argument

Cadet Peter Chew

Professor Dupal

ERH-102-02

November 3, 2022

 

  • Are tech giants obligated to promote freedom of speech? Are they exempt because they are private companies?

During my 2022 fall semester at The Virginia Military Institute, I was invited to a Leadership and Ethics event by “VMI Building BRIDGES Club”, where I and other Cadets engaged in civil debate steered by a discussion moderator. The topic of discussion was “Is Social Media a Threat to Democracy”. Whilst there I presented the point that social media was an evolution of speech, a natural development of freedom of speech that originated in technological progress, i.e. the invention of the internet, and the media revolution, Western Society has in a way moved from the traditional view of using the public Townsquare as the mainstream platform of expression, migrating to the apparatus of social media — it simply evolved with technology. There were many good viewpoints and opinions presented by others on the topic, among the fourteen or so members present, there was a consensus that social media does in a way present a threat to democracy, but in theory so does any form of speech, regardless of where it is delivered, the reasoning being that the freedom of expression and speech is what allows movements to gain attention and grow, it is the essential machine of any society with a government, it is what allows the people to express their resentment or approval.

Means of expression is the ultimate tool of a citizen, it is what allowed Regimes to grow unstable and collapse, what elected democratic and prosperous leaders, However, it has also allowed for those with ill-intent, the authoritarians to gain power, the rise of Hitler and Mussolini is a direct link to their usage of their own freedom of speech and expression to grow a cult following and slowly but eventually becoming rulers of their masses. The infamous Joseph Goebbels and his usage of rhetorical speeches and what was one of the first things they did as soon as such men gain power? At once oppressive regimes censored the printing press and restricted the freedom of speech and expression, censorship was rampant all who defied were subjected to punishment by the State regime, and the government became the regulator of freethinkers., (BBC News). This is ultimately what the 1st amendment attempts to quell, the government cannot interfere with the opinions of its citizens, free thinks, and their rights. However, when that platform, which was once a public physical entity, has moved to a virtual platform run and headed by legal control of private enterprise and their policies, which do not entirely adhere to the first amendment, some may see this as a problem, especially when concerning the aspect of censorship..

Social Media is a powerful tool of speech and expression, and if calls for illegal activity are advocated for — there are and should continue to be legal repercussions. The highest peak of such contention occurred during the election results of the 2020 presidential run. The infamous day that is deemed by the mainstream media as an attack upon the very own democratic institutions of The United States of America that day being January 6th, 2021. The lackluster and polarized administration of the Presidency of Donald Trump, the 45th President of the United States, created a big divide and political instability within the country. Leading up to a crucial election both sides of the aisle were on the edge of their seats. Furthermore, the flow of political dogmatism on social media apps such as Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and many more, was unprecedented compared to the previous election of 2016. The hyper-connectivity offered by the internet and social media allowed for groups to mobilize upon the Capitol Building openly communicating to storm democratic institutions.

The spread of “Fake News” and misinformation conflicting with factual evidence allowed for a quick stream of chaos to occur that day. Confused, frustrated supporters of the former President, unleashed unsubstantiated resentment upon the Capitol. As previously stated, democracy is a system of caution. From the smallest minority opinion to the majority, enough can transform the path of a nation. This was apparent during the January 6th election results, the question of democracy itself was undermined and questioned by its citizenry. The call for violence and re-counts of already declared votes were a sign of loss of confidence in the electoral integrity and of the democratic process itself. With all the occurrences, the nation was unsure of the future outcome of such an event. The structure itself of democracy was questioned.

The New York Times reported on this issue, reporter Sheera Frenkel stated: “On social media sites used by far-right, such as Gab and Parler directions on which streets to take to avoid the police and which tools to bring to help pry open doors were exchanged in comments.”( Sheera Frenkel, New York Times), usage of social media for purpose of assembly and protest should be allowed, however when it encourages calls for violence and attacks upon the democratic institution, at that point, it no longer becomes an act of freedom of speech but calls for political terrorism. Furthermore: “Calls for violence against members of Congress and for pro-Trump movements to retake the capitol”… “been circulating online for months”… “movements like Qanon and the Proud Boys”,… “openly organized on social media networks and recruited others to their cause.”, (Sheera Frenkel, New York Times). The question of whether private companies were obligated to control such speech and calls for riots, is a difficult question to answer, as the premise of this essay is to support the idea of applying the standards of the 1st amendment to U.S. Social Media Companies. Social media essentially is a polarized medium of information, algorithms detect the user’s behavior, interests, and activity and use this analytical data to specifically tailor receipts of information instituted by the private corporation, with today’s laws such companies have the right to censor users. Ultimately the question is should such people as CEOs and Twitter employees have the right to censor others’ speech?

The question of censorship is not a universal issue, but a localized one — It is dependent on the particulars of a nation and its transparency of ethics and morals, of how it reflects on their governmental institutions. For instance, the mainstream notion of freedom of speech, the want to have the right to speak freely is a phenomenon that was truly realized in America with the U.S. Constitution, where it was brought upon the Western hemisphere and demonstrated that it could be done, ever since the founding, the growing influence of American values and liberalism, that is further helped by the mere fact that most of these Tech Giants are either founded or have Headquarters within the territorial boundaries of the U.S. have spread with Globalization and cultural exchange of technology to virtually every corner of the globe. With this spread, people from other countries around the world, have developed a sense of liberal values, usually among the intelligentsia population. With this sophisticated group, the push for values of freedom of speech, habeas corpus, and human rights activism has ever been so greater, especially with the integration of social media. Within the United States, social media unquestionably plays a crucial role in political affairs. The George Floyd Protests that occur because of what is perceived as police brutality was the creation of an unprecedented political movement of activism, and justful protests, along with riots and violent behavior among some crowds. This became even more futile when the trial of the police officer was ongoing, such frustration among the disposed population expressed their emotions on the streets of major metropolitan areas across America, similar to how January 6th was an emotionally charged event worsened by activity on social media.

On the most basic level, democracy may sound simple in objectivity. It is a system of government where power is exercised by the people. However, like all things it is more complicated than that. The advent of liberalism and the promotion of civil liberties such as freedom of speech has made democracy an outstanding achievement of Western Civilization, despite its fragility. As America and the rest of the world have seen in the past decade, social media continues to play an ever-increasing role of importance in the matters of political stability of a nation, and the power to give private companies that legal right to regulate what sort of speech is prohibited or allowed on their social media platform should be an infringement on the 1st amendment. Regardless, an attempt to censor “fake news” is an attack on freedom of speech, “Once established to crush fake news, the Facebook mechanism could be repurposed to crush other types of information that might cause moral panic. This cure for fake news is worse than the disease.”, (Retrieved from Post-Fact, Post-Truth Society? – The Cure for Fake News…, Jack Shafer, 443).

However, the issue remains big tech is not required by law to conform to the freedom of speech clause. The first amendment, which is part of the Bill of Rights adopted in 1791, is embedded into the U.S. Constitution and protects five freedoms granted to a U.S. Citizen: freedom of religion, freedom of the press, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and freedom of petition – It is a protection against the powers of public government and not private enterprise. The first amendment rightfully claims the following: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” (National Archives). It could be re-adjusted so it applied to the private sector by voting on ratification or adjustment to the amendment, furthermore, this would but the government and institutional law essentially in control of the Private Sector, which ultimately is a bad thing and defeats the purpose of the 1st amendment.  It is in the best interest for social media to filter content, specifically those that do not fall under the guidelines of the 1st amendment, such as calls for violence, harassment, illegal content, and so on. There is nothing wrong with having a clean polished platform, while still allowing for degrees of freedom of speech, the question is what is the possible solution for private companies, how should they monitor content, and what other means are there of enforcing civility without censorship?

While analyzing for a solution to this issue, I stumbled upon a possible solution presented by Clinical psychologist Dr. Jordan B, Peterson, who purposed the idea that – The people who are dominating the online comment sections, specifically those who post anonymously, that is without any real form of identification, under a fake alias, tend to dominate the political discourse. In some sense, this is what Peterson calls a new form of pollution, that is also “corporate-sponsored” – pollution of the domain of public discourse. This pollution occurs; because social media companies are enabling this or fail to control those who are known in popular parlance as trolls. Such individuals are not good for discourse, they seek to toxic and disrupt the domain, under the guidelines of free speech, essentially, they are abusing a right by acting disruptive and contributing nothing of value. What should be done, especially with the new adminstratice change of Twitter which came about with Elon Musk’s recent acquisition of Twitter, Inc. Such social media platforms that have millions of active users should be required ti implement “Know your customer laws”, this helps the people who are posting who are genuine verified persons, who are willing to abide by the rules, with their personal reputation on the line, should be put in a sperate more valued comment section. Whilst “online anonymous users or trolls” should be placed in a different comment section, this way would help mitigate such pollution ton public discourse, while still giving both sides the right to freedom of speech without directing censoring users (Rigolizzo, John. “Dr. Jordan B. Peterson: The Daily Wire”).

Freedom of speech will always be a threat to the stability of democracy but that is simply the order of nature. Ultimately what matters is — should private companies have the right to institute policies that control, censor, and directs their users to engage in. That being that people will also have the right to simply not use the such platform and move to another one, but that is where it becomes an issue, for platforms such as Twitter, Instagram and Facebook that is where the most users are — where one’s voice can have the highest reach, a restriction of that should be unconstitutional. However, it is not due to it being performed by a private company, if I had to suggest a solution to this issue, it would not be the idea to extend the application of the 1st amendment to private companies. This should be the last option and only when the situation is truly dire and other solutions failed, and if applied it should be strictly enforced to specifically companies defined as social media platforms, where if they reside and are registered as a U.S. company they must adhere to the constitutional law. And similar laws already exist such as the “Civil Rights Act of 1964” which prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin — applies not only to government agencies but the private sector itself. Because social media plays such a prominent role in everyday life, for some it is their main source of information, and communication regarding the status of the world and society, it may sway public opinion along with the harmful effects of misinformation and it can cause a wave of violence. (US EEOC, Civil Rights Act of 1964). Out of the options presented, the solution by Dr. Jordan B. Peterson seemed to be the most neutral and least complicated one. It still grants private companies’ autonomy without legal enforcement and is the least limiting option in terms of censorship, it also provides social media complaints the moral and ethical reasons to obligate themselves to provide a more professional, less polluted medium for public discourse, where all who follow, policy and guidelines similar that simply prohibit illegal activity should be allowed to exercise their right to freedom of speech and expression online.

Works Cited:

“Control through Propaganda and Censorship – Nazi Control of Germany – National 5 History Revision – BBC Bitesize.” BBC News, BBC, https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/zn8sgk7/revision/3.

Ramage, John D., et al. Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings. Pearson, 2019.

Rigolizzo, John. “Dr. Jordan B. Peterson: Social Media Is Part of ‘Pollution of the Domain of Public Discourse’.” The Daily Wire, The Daily Wire, 12 Nov. 2022, www.dailywire.com/news/dr-jordan-b-peterson-social-media-is-part-of-pollution-of-the-domain-of-public-discourse.

Frenkel, Sheera. “The Storming of Capitol Hill Was Organized on Social Media.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 6 Jan. 2021, www.nytimes.com/2021/01/06/us/politics/protesters-storm-capitol-hill-building.html.

Stjernfelt, Frederik, and Anne Mette Lauritzen. “Your Post Has Been Removed : Tech Giants and Freedom of Speech.” OAPEN Home, Springer Nature, 1 Apr. 2020, https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/22854.

Shafer, Jack, et al. “The Cure for Fake News Is Worse than the Disease.” POLITICO Magazine, 22 Nov. 2016, www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/11/the-cure-for-fake-news-is-worse-than-the-disease-214477/.

       –, Ramage, John D., et al. Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings. Pearson, 2019. Published in Post-fact, Post-Truth Society? – Jack Shafer, “The Cure for Fake News is Worse Than the Disease; Stop being Trump’s Twitter Fool. Page, 442.

“The Bill of Rights: A Transcription.” National Archives and Records Administration, National Archives and Records Administration, www.archives.gov/founding-docs/bill-of-rights-transcript.

“The Limits of Free Speech in Social Media.” The Limits of Free Speech in Social Media | Accessible Law, 26 Apr. 2021, accessiblelaw.untdallas.edu/limits-free-speech-social-media.

Essay 1 – Learning By Degrees

Cadet Peter Chew

Professor Dupal

ERH-102-02

October 20, 2022

 

Rhetorical analysis of “Learning By Degrees”

Most youths in high school during their junior to senior years’ experience very stressful moments in their lives. The overwhelming decision of which college they are accepted to is almost a determining factor in their life. Which depends solely on what universities the students are accepted or rejected from. The following article serves as a further reading resource to help answer the underlying question of whether college is truly that much of a determinant in terms of bridging that gap of sound employment. What is more, is if that financial commitment for four years of college tuition – pays off in the end or if one is simply better off without a degree, all of which is very subjective. Nevertheless, the article attempts to alleviate this vacillate question.

            The author states their credentials and background as evidence of credibility and authority on the subject matter. When reading the article “Learning by Degrees” by Rebecca Mead; the audience may choose what to conclude from the readings, based on the information and context provided by the author. The intended audience is High Schoolers, College students, and prospective Students who may be seeking whether going to college is worth the financial sacrifice. The purpose of the author is to state enough evidence and reason to let the audience determine whether one or not one should go to college and what Major may be the best option in terms of job security after graduation. The genre; is education and life-planning. Mead presents statistical facts for the reader to digest, a persuasion method of Logos. The article was written in the context of the aftermath of the 2008 recession and the side effects encountered by those who had to adapt and re-plan their life in terms of attending college.

            The article is specifically tailored for the College industry, that is aspiring college students. For current students enrolled in higher education, the article raises the question of whether the time and financial commitments are truly worth the outcome for a prospective student, and if the presumed standard of living and job market offers will be satisfactory based on that degree. For those who seek employment without a college degree, might not result in an unwanted outcome. The author uses the Times — Appeal to Ethos, as a source for the basis of the claim; “Eight out of ten job categories that will add the most employees during the next decade… can be performed by someone without college degrees.” (Mead). A statement backed by Richard K. Bedder, of Ohio University, the founder of the Center for College Affordability and Productivity. With such a statement and occupation, it seems questionable for someone who has a Ph.D. to consider that college is not always needed, despite reaching one of the highest levels of education attainable. Despite this, it is still quite persuasive to the reader. Take into consideration, those who are not very financially secure and may be looking for employment without college as a prospect.

            Furthermore, the author added the question raised by Professor Vedder to intrigue the audience to think; “Why fifteen percent of mail carriers have bachelor’s degrees.”(Mead). Financial choices are brought to question. Specifically, that fifteen percent of mail carriers could’ve made a deposit on a mortgage, instead of paying for college. This statement is however questionable since there is no data provided in order to know how many of those mail carriers, had a college scholarship, or financial aid to where such amount was not exactly spent on college but granted to them without loans. That is where skepticism comes into play in regard to the augment being made by Professor Vedder and presented by Mead, which presents statistical facts for the reader to digest, a persuasion method of Logos; However, this becomes a fallacy and makes the persuasion somewhat ineffective, due to the underlying questions of “fifteen percent”.

            The overall premise is presented in a neutral fashion by the author. Despite this, the statement of the article is that not all should go to college. In fact, it is better for some to seek blue-collar jobs or non-college white-collar jobs. Because one must still consider the demands of the job market. Not all who have a college degree are needed by the job market, which is why it should be diversified. It should be made appealing to seek employment without college, and not as negative connotation in societal norms to not be in possession of a college diploma. This is why the author appeals to Ethos by making examples of how well-known people such as Steve Jobs and Bill Gates, became very successful as college drop-outs. Now, this can be quite dangerous to romanticize because not everyone can achieve such an endeavor, and it may be safer to simply continue in college and receive ad diploma as a guarantee of a higher pay position in the job market.

            The author mentions a previous American President: Barrack Obama as a support structure to the argument. An appeal to Ethos and Logos, Obama gained his degrees from prestigious universities, which oddly enough was seen as a negative symbol of elitism to his critics, as evidence of “unfitness for office” (Mead), The author makes a more pragmatic clarification of the belief that a professionally oriented college degree is not enough of a guarantee of a long-lasting job. This connects back to the previous statement, the author continues on the argument made by Professor Vedder (Ph.D., University of Illinois) regarding the economic trade-off of those who attend College. According to Professor Vedder, “Some of them could have bought a house for what they spent on their education.” (Mead). This argument is further backed by Economist Professor Robert I. Lerman of American University (Ph.D., M.I.T.) who informed the newspaper the Times “that high schools should focus on the acquisition of skills appropriate to the workplace.”, (Mead). Elaborated by the need for the ability to “solve problems and make decisions”, to resolve conflict and negotiate, cooperate with others, and listen actively. This is the argument against all going to college because a certain portion of the population is needed in the workforce outside of and before college.

            Rebecca Mead expands the views of skepticism about the value of college. To name a few highly successful figures whom have dropout of higher education and achieved success in life, they have unquestionably, exfoliated a certain romance among youthful aspirations for a bet to land a better life, without that four-year commitment. The author makes an appeal to Ethos by describing the case of Steve Jobs, and his counterpart Bill Gates both left College in pursuit of their talents. A persuasive strategy that caught my attention, was when the author mentioned that George W. Bush’s lack of displaying himself as an intellectual figure was seen as a good thing among the critics, for the reason stated that – according to Noonan’s writing in the Wall Street Journal “Intellectuals start all the trouble in the world.” This phrase functions as an appeal to pathos, an attempt to discourage intellectual, highly educated figures, since they seem to present a certain danger due to their desire and further educated understanding of the world. A motive to discredit Collegians from higher positions of power.

            All of this, ties to how the author mentions how advocates have the incentive to promote a certain aspect of the population to skip college. The advent of economic downturn, as an appeal to Pathos (emotion and uncertainty) to discredit the viability of a diploma — to be seen as a bad investment. The author presents two arguments to the reader, establishing the potential positives which are gained from attending an institute of higher education. However, staying truthful in argumentation — the negatives and positives of college are mentioned. This is an effective means of argument, which raises the question for the audience to determine the answer. It requires the reader to engage in critical thinking, based on the information provided by the author. Mead does not decide for the reader; rather the style of writing and language is crafted in a tone of neutrality on the subject. What is stated is factual evidence and applicable, and if concerns are raised that is for the audience to determine its significance. Instead, factual examples are made to help the reader decide which major may be the right option, such as “Math majors are more likely than their peers in other majors to find themselves promptly and gainfully employed”, (Mead).

            Ultimately it is between two spectrums of thought — the pedagogy of education; is preferable to have more who engage in critical thought enhanced by their overall liberal arts education or to develop in them an ability to listen actively, or cooperation with others, as problem solvers. Favorable are both options, that should be divided into desired paths, in order to form an “engaged citizenry” (mead). That is the people who have use and utility to the overall well-being of society; engaged in the nature of productivity, and achievement of results for the betterment of all. The question of which path offers the most sound-safest option simply does not hold true. Because with neither option is it possible to know what the prospects may be, with or without a diploma one may have greater, less, or if not an equal chance of opportunity of found employment. It is in practice a pragmatic matter which is beneficial to the nation.

                                                            Works cited:

            Mead, Rebecca. “Learning by Degrees.” The New Yorker. 06 June 2010.

Critical Reflection for Essay 1

Peter Chew

ERH-101-02

Mrs. Smith

July 6, 2022

Word count: 337

HR: Reflection on my Essay 1 The Literacy Narrative Essay: An Inquiry about a Bilingual Sponsorship. Peter N. Chew

Critical Reflection: An inquiry About a Bilingual Sponsorship

My reflection process for this essay was very helpful, one thing that I discovered in my writing process for this essay. Which changed my perspective on what I need to do for the betterment and improvement of my writing process, and to further improve my ability to criticize the essays of other students.

After reading my essay over, during the Student Conference meeting with Mrs. Smith along with her input on my draft which was extremely helpful, during this process I in noticed many spelling and grammatical mistakes, which made me quite surprised. However, I realized that these errors were because of my decision to write the rough draft very early in the morning at around 3 am when I started. As a result of me being already tried while writing and being more focused on achieving the required word count. I did not pay the careful attention that I should have to the grammar and structure of the essay.

While re-reading my essay I was able to expose my spelling mistakes and repetitive run-off sentences. All of which after the revision I attempted to fix. As I continued writing while doing corrections to finalize my essay. What I learned is that I should have not attempted to write such an essay early in the morning while being fatigued. The proper time to do it is in the evening or afternoon, which is the time that I am aiming for in the next writing process. When it came to peer-review feedback on essays, I found them to be helpful since they hinted at my mistakes and my incomplete MLA format for the essay. While I provided similar critical feedback on my peer’s essays, I enjoyed reading through their essays.

A key takeaway from this reflection is to be fore focused and concentrated in the writing process and to be careful with run-off sentences, repetitive words, and grammatical errors. All of which could be avoided by simply taking breaks and re-reading my essay while in the writing process.

Critical reflection for Essay 2

ERH-101-02

Peter Chew

Mrs. Smith

July 21, 2022

Word count: 359

Critical reflection: The Discourse Community of the Border War

When writing this essay, the main thing that caused complications for me was figuring out what specific discourse community (Swales 466) I was going to write about. I eventually choose my involvement in an internet group that focuses on the history of the South African Defense Force. A challenging topic since it required many references and citations, a process in which I am not very skilled. After reading on the subject along with my accumulative knowledge, I started writing the paper. my writing was to capture the historical context for my topic, and how South African society was during that time, such as racial issues, and political instability. However, the main topic was the Discourse Community (Swales 466) of the South African Defense Force during the Border War, and how this specific community had its own unique words and rich exchange of language and differing cultures.

I was introduced to this community when I joined an online communication forum called “Discord”. This specific forum comprised its own community (Swales 466) of people who were also interested in the South African Defense Force subject. In my essay, I tried to explain how different ethnicities that served in the SADF during a wartime environment were able to see past cultural, ethical, and racial differences. They were able to unite against a common cause, this made a peaceful co-existence between ethnicities and a unique clash of language, as both sides exchanged words and lexis for belongingness in that community. This language eventually transformed the culture of this organization (military).

            While writing one of my challenges was finding sources that could provide evidence to back up the claims that I made in the paper, and how to cite them properly. At some point, I even made footnotes for the essay. However, I was told that footnotes are not needed in MLA format but are predominantly used in Chicago format. After consultation, I learned how to properly cite in MLA format after consultation. I enjoyed writing about this subject, I believe this influenced my improvement in writing this paper. Further backed by my interest in and prior knowledge in this subject surrounding the South African Defense Force.

References:

‘Down:. Wo.f’dle, the Concept of I Discourse Community. https://mjreiff.com/uploads/3/4/2/1/34215272/swales.pdf. 

Essay 4

Peter Chew

ERH-101-02

Mrs. Smith

July 26, 2022

HR: Works cited page; The grading rubric provided by the course instructor for The Discourse Community of The Border War by Peter Chew. Peter N. Chew

Essay 4: Reflection on My Previous Writings

My writing over the course of summer session II ERH-101 has been a journey of improvement and learning. I sense that my writing has gradually improved in terms of grammar and punctuation, an aspect of composition which I have had difficulty with in the past. However, there is one aspect that still needs more attention to improve. Writing has always been a liked activity for me, and now having the opportunity to write on topics that I would have never considered has been an interesting experience. I usually tend to read and write papers focused on history or politics. There was a time in high school when I was quite fond of writing about great English authors such as Ernest Hemingway. Nonetheless, during this course, it was quite challenging to get started with the writing.

I spent a lot of time thinking of how I was going to write, and how that would meet the specifications of the prompt. But once I got past the hard part, I would start the transfer of ideas directly to my essay. Paragraph after paragraph of writing continuously until I stopped to take a much-needed break, typically twenty minutes. After which I continued where I previously left off. With the nature of the summer, session time is cut short, and assignments are due in a very narrow window of time. Unlike the traditional academic semester where assignments are due 5 to 8 days in-between, providing ample time to complete them. Summer Session provided a new challenge in which I had to improve my time management skills to complete my assignments and essays on time. For instance, trying to balance my study time between my two classes was at times not very consistent. I would find myself spending too much time doing homework along with studies for my economics class instead of my writing class. It was more of an attempt to find the perfect balance between the two.

Another issue that I noticed a pattern of in my writing was run-off sentences, which remain a problem that reflects in my writing. I understand why I have the habit of making these mistakes, which originated from my upbringing in the Brazilian Schooling system, where I wrote essays mostly in the Portuguese language, which has different grammatical rules and structures along with syntax and so on. Portuguese has a tendency of having long sentences with few periods and more commas. It is quite common to write more than it is needed to explain a concept in Portuguese, something that ends up being a long paragraph could instead be condensed into a few words or a short paragraph in the English language to convey the same message. Learning to write in both languages has always been a unique trait of mine. It can be quite confusing at first to switch between the grammatical rules and spelling since English stems from the Germanic tree of languages and Portuguese is the opposite having its roots in Latin. Both languages have their own unique and complex case of grammatical structures. However, the more challenging one to master is Portuguese, simply because of the vast number of grammatical rules and because unlike English, it has a constant change of grammatical rules that is set by the Association of Scholars of the Portuguese Language.

When I came to the United States for High School, one of several major changes was the instantaneous switch to the English language, all things were virtually in this language. And so I begin to write, speak and think in English. I believe that my grammatical problems are partly due to my bilingual formal education, it is simply that I need to spend more time refining my writing skills and grammatical rules in both languages but specifically English since it serves as my second language. The Portuguese language likes very long sentences that are verbose, while the English language tends to be more concise in conveying an idea which means that sentences are shorter than what one finds in Portuguese. However, one of my biggest keys to successful writing which is receiving a mark higher than a letter grade B on a paper is revision, I cannot emphasize how crucial it was for me to proofread my essay. Because the writing process itself can be very tedious and chaotic, lots of writing in such a short time, virtually spewing words at the screen, all to make something concise out of it, trying to insert a claim, or proof a point takes effort and making sure that your writing makes sense to the reader is very important. The most effective way to do this at least for me thus far was to revise each paragraph, particularly reading out loud. It allowed me to catch spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, run-off sentences, missing periods, or commas…etc. If it wasn’t for my revisions my finished papers would not be as refined.

Another improvement to my writing during the length of this summer course was the extremely helpful faculty meetings with my instructor for ERH-101 Mrs. Smith. The meetings would usually last about half an hour. However, in that short amount of time, I was able to dissect so much helpful information, the instructor’s feedback, and further explanation of the term or topic idea for my paper which I did not understand until the instructor clarified its meaning. Mrs. Smith would also make me read out loud each paragraph of my paper while we both listen for any grammatical mistakes or unconcise information that was written that doesn’t need to be in the paper. For my second essay, “The Discourse Community of The Border War” (Chew 1). I noticed a few mistakes after I had received my paper graded. Despite receiving a grade of ninety-five out of one hundred. The input that I had received from the inductor, made it evident that I should had done more revision. The paper had a few flaws such as grammar, and mechanics, and fragmented sentences, that need a comma or further clarification for it to make sense to the reader. For example, take the following passage from my second essay: “As well much of it was taken and brought by the younger generation of that time such as (that were) teenagers who were called upon for their mandatory conscription at the age of eighteen.” (Chew 3). Apart from the fragmented sentence and a few grammatical errors, the sentence is not wrong in the presentation of fact and how it ties to the central thesis of the paper. However, it needed more care and detail to properly fit to the mentioned paragraph, since it is evident that it caused the reader some confusion. An aspect of the paper that could have been caught if I had done more revision and corrections, but because of the lack of time and my time management it was not achievable. Something which has time after time come to my attention the need for me to improve my time management by having a fixed work schedule of when to rest and when to do schoolwork. My method of chaotic time management has done more harm than good for my college career, since it is making up a “deadweight loss” a term used by economics that describes (the loss of something which could have been achieved) in ample time that could have been expropriated for the benefit of my schoolwork.

Another example which caught my attention is a except from a run-off sentence which comprised of a fragmented phrase: “Baring no attention to the native African languages”. This phrase was attempting to connected to the previous paragraph of “Afrikaans and English recognized as official languages of the apartheid government… Baring no attention…”  (Chew 8). The fragmented phrase could have connected to the previous clause mentioned if I had placed a comma or made it go before the clause to further add detail and further clarification. This could have fixed the error made. One of the last noticeable mistakes made in my second essay was the citation page, I did not properly arrange the citations in alphabetical order by having one citation being in the improper order. Again, these are all mistakes that could have been prevented if further revision and allotted time was utilized by the writer. These and a few other mistakes demonstrate what my strengths and weakness are when it comes to essay writing, all of which needs improvement. A fact which I have contempt to successfully gain with the investment of time and efforts to improve. A plan to continue improving the more I write, that is I believe that there is no such thing at being prefect at something thing at a single time, it is simply improvement and people especially writers never stop improvising. Every time I write there is something new that I learn which I further add to my arsenal of writing, because that is what is gained from continuous writing – improvement in literacy.

In my essay writing for this summer course, and according to the grading rubric for the essays that I wrote, I have thus far been able to successfully address the prompt fully and thoughtfully, advance a thesis logically by showing substantial depth and fullness, and complexity of thought. Furthermore, by choosing obscure themes such as with my Discourse Community of The Border War, essay I have been able to at least attempt to capture and compel the audience into reading my writing. All these points are further reflected in my grade for that essay. This course has taught me a lot when it comes to writing, I see it as a continuation from where I left off in high school with the completion of AP-level English courses of literary and composition. ERH-101 has opened new methods and techniques of writing, because of this course and the nature of college itself I am now able to write much faster as opposed to before my enrollment to this writing intensive course. I seem to demonstrate again as provided by the grade received for my essays, adequate college-level control of sentence-level expression, grammar, along with superior control over the use of sources and mastery of methods of documentation. My intended goal is to continue improving, by reading and writing more, to expand my literacy because there are still flaws being made by my writing such as grammatical errors and syntax. Such flaws which I know now and thankfully because of peer-reviews and instructor’s input. It is unequitable that I have gained further knowledge and writing skills that will serve me for the rest of my career as a student in higher education.

Works cited

Chew, Peter. “The Discourse Community of the Border War.” Virginia

 “Military Institute. 15 June 2022. – date retrieved 26 July 2022 9:25:18

Essay 1

Peter Chew

ERH-101-02

Mrs. Smith

July 5, 2022

Word count: 1755

Help Received: Works cited: Brandt, Deborah. “Sponsors of Literacy.” Peter N. Chew

An inquiry About a Bilingual Sponsorship

I started my literacy journey in and out of two countries over the years of my childhood to early teenage years. My bilingual childhood influenced the development of my literacy simultaneously in both English and Portuguese languages. From an early age, I was influenced by constant exposure to both the American and Brazilian cultures, enabling me to obtain a native literacy from the places where I lived and went to school. The educational approach that I received and the friends along with family with whom I grew up in both countries are some of the countless sponsors which influenced my path in literacy.

Brandt defines sponsors as “any agents, local or distant, concrete or abstract, who enable, support, teach, model, as well as recruit, regulate, suppress, or withhold literacy and gain an advantage.” (Brandt 167), in some capacity. There are positive and negative aspects to forming a bilingual upbringing, there are trade-offs however limited if done properly, but the advantages outweigh any drawbacks. My household comprised of two languages English and Portuguese with a minimal amount of French and German from my grandparents, However, my exposure to French and German was not enough to make a substantial impact on my literacy. The main influences are the first two languages mentioned. Within my family, my parents were crucial agents of sponsorship to my literacy development by teaching me the ability to speak, write, and read. My parents determined where I received my formal education. In the first years of my life, my mother enrolled me in a Swiss-German School (Escola Suiça) In São Paulo, Brazil. To my surprise, I do not remember much from my early school years except for some friendships and learning the Portuguese language, things that despite not remembering, make up a part of me and my literacy journey. The mid-to-preteen years of my childhood were spent in a Brazilian-American School called Escola Pan-Americana de Bahia. The school program was a mixture of Brazilian and American teachers who taught local Brazilians and American kids in Salvador, Brazil. The reason for this international school was because, in the city where I lived and went to school, there was quite a large group of American families who moved to Salvador to work for Ford and for Dow Chemicals which have manufacturing plants in that region. The school was the closest experience to going to school in the U.S. for someone living in Brazil.

My time at the Pan-American School, was a crucial phase where my formal literacy skills were developed, influenced by American and Brazilian elements of culture, a hybrid of languages and their respective culture comprised my personality and understanding. Simultaneously learning about American and Brazilian literature, and being taught mathematics, history, geography, philosophy, and other school subjects in both languages, I went back and forth between English and Portuguese which at times could be quite confusing for some school subjects such as math and English grammar. The Portuguese language and diction are more complex in structure and grammatical rules than the English language making it difficult to transition between. After I moved to the U.S. to attend High School during my Junior and Senior years, I focused more on the English Language and strictly used Portuguese only when communicating with friends and family from Brazil. In the United States, as I spoke more English, I noticed improvements in my vocabulary and grammar. Besides my parents, a major impact on my literacy was brought by an English Teacher at Miller School (High School) in Charlottesville, VA, he functioned as a sponsor who contributed to my English literacy development. He would assign readings from great authors such as T.S. Elliot, Ernest Hemingway, and many other prominent 20th-century authors and poets. The style of writing from this era of the “Lost Generation, “of writers made me more intrigued with reading and writing than ever before. It’s as if I had discovered a key to a door that opened a new world of possibilities brought by my consumption of the texts from such books. As I missed the continuation of my Portuguese language development. Since I had put a pause on my education in Portuguese while in the U.S. For a bilingual student, it is important to maintain engagement in both languages simultaneously, my mistake was that I temporarily stopped for two years.

There is a negative but minimal, consequence to learning at an early age, academic subjects in both languages during the crucial early development phase of any person. The problem is the fear of falling behind in contemporary trends in a particular language, one challenge for me is the usage of novel words or the appropriate usage of slang and formal speech, which constantly changes as the months and years go by. For instance, if one lives outside their native country for a decade, they are no longer being exposed to the trends and cultural aspects of their country. Instead, the language and cultural influences are replaced by the country that one now lives in. In my case, I am starting to lose balance between the American and Portuguese cultures using more English, making it my primary language. One becomes more fluent in said language due to more exposure to that language. Making one more confident and knowledgeable of that specific language over the other, one gains more literacy in another language but loses some advantage that they might have had or could have gained in the other language. This is the trade-off since it can be extremely hard to learn both and keep up with trends in two distinct. Cultures and countries. One must intentionally choose to focus on two languages. After my first year in college, during the Summer, I returned to the routine of reading and writing along with exposure to English and Portuguese to further my development in both languages. Since my parents taught me that it is important to be able to have an intellectual and engaging conversation with someone in multiple languages such as Portuguese or English, it is good to have access and knowledge to vocabularies relative to the subject of that conversation. Essentially if one wants to talk to someone from another country who only speaks in their language, it is better to know the formal words specifically attributed to that particularly subject. For instance, if engaged in a conversation about politics with a person who speaks Portuguese, and one is trying to say the word “gerrymandering” but one does not know the specific word for it in the Portuguese language, one will probably find themselves either struggling to figure out a similar word in Portuguese or frantically attempting to explain the meaning of that word so that person can try to understand what one is trying to communicate. All this seems quite unnecessary. And frustration can arise at times. Such a situation could be avoided if one continues to maintain and care for their bilingual literacy development. Therefore, I am motivated to maintain my literacy development in both languages and enhance my skills.

Family, school, and friends were the most important influential aspect of forming my literacy. Parents are the most important because children mimic some characteristics of their parents, either figure of speech, behavior, or their interest in a particular subject. Parents usually are role models which also applies to literacy sponsors. Furthermore, at an early age, your social group is crucial to forming your basis of knowledge about social cues and proper usage of slang and social humor. Having grown up with exposure to the cultures and people of two different countries, I was fortunate enough to learn and to develop social skills in accordance to the societal norms of the two countries. For instance, I have realized that there are certain types of humor, writing, and interests that are common and adaptable in both American and Brazilian culture, while there are also certain things that are not approved nor accepted in one culture over the other. For example, the relative interest in Nascar Racing can be quite common in the rural parts of the U.S. However, this is quite the opposite in Brazil, who find more leisure in watching a soccer match. Hence, there is no point in trying to have a conversation about that sport with a Brazilian because they either have limited knowledge of it or zero interest. All these are important social cues for bilingual development, to be aware of societal norms to further be successful when writing about a particular subject, knowing what to include, and when making conversation.

Of course, aspects of culture are taught by exposure to either the local culture or through other means such as books, I read literature in English and Portuguese, which teaches the defining social parts of those cultures. Sources of mass entertainment and information such as television, movies, news, and other sources also provide literacy influences on someone. Movies act as visual storytelling and are a good way to get cultural exposure. As I grew up and started to access the internet, along with social media, I became connected, despite being in distant locations from either being in Brazil or the United States, exposing me to those cultures with more instant accessibility. Due to the internet, there is now instant access and exchange of knowledge and communication between countries, cultures, and people. Cultural exposure is no longer limited to school, a specific location, or one’s household. Cultural exposure is now broad from many different sources and sponsors. Social media sources that allow for instant exposure to distinct cultures, further develop literacy sponsors. This makes keeping up with trends and social change in diverse cultures much easier and more accessible, something which I pay attention to since it allows me to keep up with contemporary changes. The innovation of the internet has allowed people from all corners of the globe to connect with one another. This connectively along with access to educational products and services, has contributed to the rate of more people learning a second, third, or even fourth language. To be considered an educated person and maintain their education in two or more languages, one needs to access literacy sponsors to be willing to use the sponsors. To be competent in Portuguese and in English, it is more important to maintain a constant exposure to these languages and their cultures, and not lose track of their significant societal events or changes which has effects to the change of the way of language and speech.

Works Cited

Brandt, Deborah. “Sponsors of Literacy.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 49, no. 2, 1998, pp. 165–185. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/358929. Accessed 4 Jul. 2022.

 

Essay 2

Peter Chew

ERH-101-02

Mrs. Smith

July 15, 2022

Word Count: 2,650

HR: Works Cited Page, The concept of Discourse Community by John Swales. Peter N. Chew

The Discourse Community of The Border War

A community that once existed in great numbers, unbeknown to many, was in the middle of a forgotten conflict. Unprecedented events caused despair in this community, dissolved by politics. Its sole existence remained with the various peoples who served in such a community. Its memory is made vivid only in occasional events of remembrance of that unique time. With the passage of time, the community members have slowly gone away with time, some of the old age, while others simply disconnected themselves from it. Some couldn’t escape the way of life that the war imposed on them and so they sought their own adventure outside the country in the action-packed life of a Mercenary. Some became top executives of multinational firms or lived humble lives as dairy farmers. There are many stories about the outcome of the members of the Bush War. Despite all this, the past is preserved, not only in museums but as a living culture by the survivors of the conflict or by their children who maintain their unique style of language, specifically words, that are solely exclusive to the men who lived and fought on the Southern Angolan Border.

After years of learning about history, I found myself searching articles and documentaries regarding the Cold War, an intriguing time, a moment in human history when tensions between the Soviet Union and the United States threatened world peace. The Cuban missile crisis brought the threat of nuclear annihilation to the suburbs of Florida. The Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union was a period of small regional wars, tales of espionage, geopolitical chess, and a world divided between East and West. The Cold War environment fostered cultural changes in the West such as the civil rights movements. As I sought knowledge on the Cold War, I become intrigued with what can be considered obscure history such as the Angolan Bush War where South African Defense Forces (SADF), found themselves in a proxy war with the Eastern Bloc nations in the testing grounds of the Angolan Civil War.

However, my journey started when I was invited to join a server on an online social media communication app called “Discord”. Being a part of this server was my introduction to this specific discourse community (Swales 466), that was entirely centered on the South African Bush War, it comprised of several resources that further increased my knowledge on the subject due to my interaction with forums, archival documents, pictures, and a long list of recommended books on this subject. It was made up of mostly people who had a shared interest in the subject either by historical curiosity or by a member whose family participated in that part of history. It also had a few historians who greatly contributed to the content of this discourse community (Swales 466). In this community, I became aware of the usage of slang and lexis that were specific to the Bush Wars. After being exposed to this language while on this Discord Server, I ended up doing my own research out of curiosity. I came across a wide range of slang unique to the SADF and the South African culture of the 1970s-1990s, making it a qualifier to a Discourse Community (Swales 471). Some language may be judged as offensive or objectionable. However, they reflect the culture of that time.

The local language has a wide range of linguistical origins such as English, brought by the British colonists, Zulu from African tribes who lived in the region of South Africa, along with the Khoisan peoples, or Bushman who were unique lighter skin peoples of Namibia-Southern Angola. In addition, the Afrikaners speak the language of the Dutch settlers who originally settled the Cape of Good Hope, and who made up Although, Afrikaans, the language of the Dutch settlers who originally settled the Cape of Good Hope, and who made up the majority of the 71,000 personnel at the height of the Border War in 1988 (Tsokodayi 1-305). The Afrikaners informally known as Boers (Dutch farmers), during the latter half of the 20th century served as a medium of exchange of language that comprised the lingua franca (McCormick 91-109), of the society and institutions of the South African Government, including its Armed Forces. Despite being a white minority in the country, it made up for this fact by its sheer cultural influence and control of control. Hence, why the language is solely unique and linguistic to that part of the world. Much of its cultural and linguistic influence is found in slang and lexis. As well much of it was taken and brought by the younger generation of that time such as teenagers who were called upon for their mandatory conscription at the age of eighteen. A substantial influx of teenagers brought with them these words from popular culture of that decade into the strict environment of the formidable South African Military, an environment of formal and informal tone and language for code-switching. A wide vocabulary of new distinctive terms made up that discourse community (Swales 470), terms that were used by the rookie to the officer class within the governing bodies of the SA military. The men found comfort in words that were often humorist, times offensive, or used to describe a stressful, chaotic situation, as they felt a sense of further belonging, simply by its usage.

Nothing beats a good barbecue on a hot summer’s day out in the blazing sun south of the equator on the arid, dune sands of the Northern border of Southwest Africa (today known as Namibia). However, the Afrikaners had their own term for BBQ, as they called it a “Braai” one of the most appreciated cultural words and aspects of South Africa, a delightful activity, especially for the men stationed on an Oshivello – A base inside the operational area in Southwest Africa. Unique meats were a delight among the soldiers for a feast, such as the Owambo piele – Vienna sausages, or the delicious Boerewors – literally meaning for farmer’s sausage.  Owambo Rico – extremely potent home-brewed liquor, distilled from the sap of the makalani palm tree (SWA / Angola ops. area). After a nice evening at the makeshift bar, a young rookie at the border may occasionally drink too much makalani for his own good, to the point where they suffer from the dreadful “Babbelas” – Derived from the Zulu word “ibhabhalazi” to describe a bad hangover, (Kinnear 1). Apart from the various foods and their terms, the situation of the war and what was a stake was no matter of relief. Unlike the United States which perused the geopolitical strategy of the “Domino Theory” to contain the spread of communism around the world. Such a scenario of being utilized is the famous example of the Vietnam War, which at no instant was the threat of communism as close to being on the borderlands of the U.S.A. The opposite was true for the case of S.A. The “Winds of Change” as it was called was spreading across the continent of Africa, the void left by the retreat of colonial European powers and the politburo of the Soviet Union noticed an opportunity to fill in this void and lunch a series of Red revolutions armed and backed by the Eastern Bloc. Black Nationalists under the notion of self-determinism and liberation of the dispossessed workers of the world.

A liberation movement that consumed much of the continent from Nairobi to Mombasa. Much of Sub-Sharan Africa was completely changed, the old world of Africa had died, and a new Africa was born. However, this child (Africa) was left to their own devices, abandoned by the Europeans. As a result, the lack of supervision by a higher power, the centuries-old territorial separation of different ethnicities, territorial lines being completely altered, and ethnic groups assumed control of newly independent nations. The dormant rivalries between African peoples were reignited, and as a result, a dark time engulfed much of Africa, with civil wars, genocides, and abuses inflicted by such rivalries between different ethnicities of Sub-Sharan, Africa. The Portuguese took notice of such changes, and they were one of a few European powers reluctant to completely abandon their prized overseas colonial possessions. Hence, they fought a bloody and long colonial war, against black nationalists and communists with their independence movements in an effort of maintaining their cherished colonial holdings. Mozambique and Guinea-Bissau fell to the red movement, and Angola became another victim. This is where South Africa becomes involved. Namibia was under the control of the Republic of South Africa. However, the Revolutionary movements fighting for the cause of the revolution sought to “liberate” the peoples of Namibia who found themselves under Western Capitalist white minority rule. All of which the Black nationalist detested. Revolutionaries and Nationalist trespassing into the terrorist of Namibia in the efforts to convert the territory to their cause. This was a national security threat to the South African Government and their interests who devised a policy of counterinsurgency and sent the Military to contain any further raids and movements along the Southern Angolan Border. Many of these Black nationalists were given the nickname of “Terr’s” (SADF slang for terrorists), while also seen as freedom fighters by some western institutions. Nevertheless, they were engaged in countless acts of terrorism, and their sole nature of fighting was motivated by political violence, defined as terrorism.

The South African military had units such as the 32 Battalion that comprised a mixed racial unit, becoming a great source of diversity. The men in their unit were unsegregated and not judged based on their skin. The 32 Battalion served as a sanctuary of good honorable men, who saw passed the color of the skin of others and trusted the men beside them in the trench and during the time of battle. With this uniqueness of a mix of men of all different backgrounds, there was a distinctive speech style and usage of slang. With Afrikaners, Xhosa, Khoisan, and countless other ethnicities all bunch together in one working environment, there was no question of a rich exchange of cultural and language elements. For instance, the Khoi-San expression for being surprised is “Eish!”, soon took over the lingual of most members of the unit. The Afrikaans word that could go along with anything, really, that serves as a good connotation that means “nice” or “good” is the word “Lekker” (Kinnear 1). This is used very commonly today among South Africans and was common back then during the Bush War. While in the United States, a popular word from popular culture that has taken up the vocabulary of many teenagers is the word “Bro”. A similar word is used in S.A. – “Bru” used to call a friend, pal, or buddy, a common word in popular culture.

The language barrier was fused between different cultures. The rich co-existence of different ethnicities and cultures in a military environment created bonds, friendships, and mutual respect along with the adoption of words that made up that unique discourse community (Swales 470). The gradual development from this interaction indirectly served as a counter to the racial laws of apartheid. The mere fact that peoples of all different colors, creeds, backgrounds, ethnicity, and cultures could merely co-exist in a teamwork environment and rely on one another to survive a war, is a clear case that the political cause of apartheid was a fallacy. The men of the 32 Battalion broke the barrier set by apartheid. They ate the same detested rations, slept in the blazing heat, and lived together out in the bush. If it wasn’t for their war environment, the white and the black men would have never interacted in such a way, instead continuing their old way of life, following the rules of apartheid.

            The mutual respect formed by these men in the military translated to regular life in South Africa, as some of these men would later hire their companions from the war, black or white, it no longer mattered as they were judged based on their reputation and skill and not color. The co-existence between different peoples later influenced the language and popular culture of the next generation of South Africa. The changed perspective on apartheid from the men in service during the Bush War, had an influence on the fall of apartheid since their cooperation was a contradiction to the justifications made by racial segregation. With the fall of apartheid, the schools became unsegregated, and the youth interacted with schoolmates of different backgrounds comparable to the men during the Bush War. Another barrier broken, this co-existence of schools allowed for the continual exchange of language and words, as some of these kids had already been influenced by their family since their fathers had served in the Bush War and brought an upbringing with the unique language taken from the interaction between the Afrikaner and other ethnicities.

            South African society existed in such a polarized state during the time of Apartheid and the Bush War. When Nelson Mandela was elected as the first black President of the Republic. South Africa as a nation had to gradually attempt to improve the relations between whites and blacks. Entertainment such as the sport of Rugby became a central focus point for this task since the sport was historically cantered to the white Afrikaners minority population, with their famous national team called the “Springboks”. The problem was that a portion of the black population was originally in opposition to the sport since the national team still served as a remembrance of the Apartheid era. What fluctuated the civilian perspective from the military perspective of men that served in the Bush War was that become of their co-existence and exchange of different cultural values, rugby was a common likable topic between the white and black servicemen, which facilitated the promotion of unification of culture. A process that took longer to instill in the civilian aspect of the country.

            The discourse community (Swales 472) created during the Bush War was unquestionably distinctive, despite its existence being relatively obscure to the rest of the world. However, it had an influential impact on the formation of public opinion regarding the co-existence between white and black people, a behavior that later shaped the rest of the nation. The unique exchange of language and culture defined this community into what it is. It proved that there could be a healthy co-existence between both groups without the fear of blatant discrimination. The multi-language utilized in the bush environment among the service members was contrarian in nature to the strict rules of language sent by the South African Government as to how apartheid laws made a preference for “proper” language, being Afrikaans and English recognized as official languages of the apartheid government. Baring no attention to the native African languages. An example of this is after Nelson Mandela took power, with the end of apartheid. The South African government recognized eleven official languages, 9 of those being native African languages that comprise the people of the nation. Slang and lexis were unique to the languages of Khoisan and other Zulu-based languages that received common usage among the soldiers that fought in the Bush War. Previously unrecognized languages, however after the end of apartheid gained the deserved recognition. The discourse community of the Bush War had its unique time where such peaceful co-existence along with the exchange of cultural words which were so common to the way of life of white and black men, simultaneously interacting in a world of prejudice outside the war environment. The interaction formed proved that such relations could be made in the direst moments of political situations, a testament to apartheid, nonetheless. The exchange of language made in the Bush War influenced the discourse community of a nation, it influenced the next generations, and it created a new value system among the youth, that stemmed from a cultural clash between popular culture and military culture.

Works Cited

Kinnear, Cameron. “South African Military Dictionary – Glossary of Military Terms.” South African Legion – United Kingdom & Europe, 13 Oct. 2020, https://www.salegion.org.uk/south-african-military-dictionary-glossary-of-military-terms/.

 

Swales, John. “The Concept of Discourse Community.” Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Boston: Cambridge UP, 1990. 21-32.

Tsokodayi, Cleophas. Namibia’s Independence Struggle: The Role of the United Nations. Xlibris Corporation, 2011. pp. 1-305.

McCormick, Kay. “Afrikaans as a lingua franca in South Africa: the politics of change”, vol. 2006, no. 177, 2006, pp. 91-109. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2006.006

History.com Editors. “Domino Theory.” History.com, A&E Television Networks, 9 Nov. 2009, https://www.history.com/topics/cold-war/domino-theory. 

“South Africa Ends Conscription of Whites.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 25 Aug. 1993, https://www.nytimes.com/1993/08/25/world/south-africa-ends-conscription-of-whites.html?smid=url-share.

“BBC on This Day | 3 | 1960: Macmillan Speaks of ‘Wind of Change’ in Africa.” BBC News,

BBC, 3 Feb. 1960, http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/february/3/newsid_2714000/2714525.stm.

Chew’s essays

This site includes the Archive of my Essays for the ERH-101 course & a brief introduction of me:

 

My name is Peter Chew, a Cadet at the Virginia Military Institute (VMI). This site serves as an archival space for my written essays that were submitted to ERH-101 & ERH 102 courses.

 

Brief intro:

As previously stated my name is Peter Chew, and I grew up in São Paulo, Brazil. I moved to the United States in 2019 to finish high school at a private school in Charlottesville, Virginia. After which I decided to go to VMI for college.