Zach, the outline you showed me this morning in my office is much better than this proposal. It argues less with Aristotle and focuses more on your own thoughts. It seems that Dahl’s source will be helpful to you as you explain how deliberative rhetoric counters Plato’s absolutist philosophy. Just remember, you don’t need ABSOLUTE proof Plato is wrong. You can use evidence to discuss why you think he’s wrong,but if you are learning toward contingent truths and the value of deliberation,then you need absolute proof.
Zach, the outline you showed me this morning in my office is much better than this proposal. It argues less with Aristotle and focuses more on your own thoughts. It seems that Dahl’s source will be helpful to you as you explain how deliberative rhetoric counters Plato’s absolutist philosophy. Just remember, you don’t need ABSOLUTE proof Plato is wrong. You can use evidence to discuss why you think he’s wrong,but if you are learning toward contingent truths and the value of deliberation,then you need absolute proof.