Response to Penrose and Geisler

Response to Penrose and Geisler, Writing About Writing ePages

Help Received: None

After reading Penrose and Geisler, I noticed that my writing is a lot like Janet’s.  In my analysis of Virginia Tech’s Mechanical Engineering Department as a discourse community, I included a lot of examples from both the website itself and the work of John Swales.  I did not analyze these examples very efficiently in this essay.  Like Janet, I was afraid to contradict the claims that the authors of my sources made.  I considered everything that I read to be “facts,” and this sacrificed my sense of authority in writing this paper.

To improve, I need to actually talk about the evidence I’m using in my paper, not just summarize.  I also need to be willing to come up with my own opinions instead of just relying on those of Swales.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *