Help Received: None
1. What is Janet doing?
Janet begins her introduction with a definition of what paternalism is.
2. What is Roger doing? What is he doing that’s better?
Roger begins his introduction with a series of hypothetical situations about paternalism. This is better that merely providing a definition such as what Janet did, because:
- The examples immediately give the reader an idea of what paternalism is, thus negating the need for a definition.
- They are somewhat extreme enough to challenge the reader to reconsider his/her preconceived notions as to the moral justification of the principle of paternalism.
3. How can I turn that into a set of guidelines for myself?
I can make better use of examples (even hypothetical ones) to engage my reader right from the beginning.